NTSB CAROL · Event
Event LAX01LA214
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the induction manifold fire resulting from an engine backfire during engine start. The reason for the engine backfire was not determined.
Factual narrative
On June 16, 2001, at 1230 mountain standard time, a Piper PA-28-181, N4299Q, was substantially damaged during a ground fire event at the Sedona Airport, Sedona, Arizona. The rented airplane was registered to and operated by Falcon Executive Aviation, Mesa, Arizona. Neither the private pilot nor his passenger were injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the personal flight operating under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91, and no flight plan had been filed. The flight was originating at the time of the accident and was destined for Falcon Field, Mesa, Arizona. The pilot provided the Safety Board investigator with a written statement. He stated that he and his passenger boarded the airplane after performing a standard preflight inspection. Although the runway was closed due to a disabled airplane, the pilot chose to taxi to the run-up area because he anticipated the disabled airplane would be removed when his run-up was complete. When the pilot completed the before takeoff checklist, the runway was not yet cleared, and he was informed that it would remain closed for about 20-30 minutes. Therefore, the pilot shut the engine down and waited. When the runway reopened, the pilot started the engine. During the engine start, the pilot heard a pop, which he assumed was the engine backfiring. He proceeded with the procedure for engine fire during start by continuing to crank the starter, in an attempt to draw any potential fire back into the engine intake. The engine did not start and he saw smoke coming from the engine cowl. He instructed his passenger to go outside with a small fire extinguisher located in the front side pocket, and try to extinguish the fire with the handheld extinguisher. By the time the passenger got out of the airplane and extinguished the fire bottle, "heavy smoke" was observed emanating from the left side of the engine cowl. The pilot shutoff the fuel selector and retrieved another fire extinguisher, which was located under the co-pilot seat. The pilot extinguished his bottle in the fresh air inlet on the bottom of the engine cowl, but it had no effect on extinguishing the fire. About 2 to 3 minutes later, an individual from one of the airport services arrived with a medium sized fire extinguisher. That pilot expended this fire extinguisher into the fresh air inlet and around the exhaust area and the fire appeared to go out, only to break out into flames again a few seconds later. Their efforts to fight the fire were unsuccessful. The person who brought the medium sized fire extinguisher informed the pilot that the fire department had been notified. The fire department arrived on scene 15 minutes later, and by this time, the airplane was completely engulfed in flames. A review of Piper's Engine Fire During Start emergency procedures, revealed the pilot is instructed to attempt to extinguish the fire by attempting an engine start in order to draw the excess fuel into the induction system. If the fire is present before the engine has started, the pilot is to draw the fire back into the engine by moving the mixture control to idle cutoff, open the throttle, and turn off the electric fuel pump and fuel selector while cranking the engine. Though Piper indicates that engine fires during start are "usually the result of overpriming," Glencoe's Seventh Edition of Aircraft Powerplants training manual indicates that backfiring can be caused by a number of pilot or maintenance related events. Some such events include sticking intake valves, ignition troubles, lean mixture settings, etc. The cause of the backfire was not determined. The single engine airplane burned after the engine backfired during start. The private pilot attempted to draw the ensuing fire into the induction system by continuing the engine start procedures. However, when his attempts failed to extinguish the fire, he and a passenger attempted to extinguish the fire by expelling three fire extinguishers into the intake and exhaust area of the engine cowling. The attempts were unsuccessful, and when the fire department arrived (15 minutes later), the airplane was engulfed in flames. The cause of the backfire was not determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2001_LAX01LA214.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Just Culture in Aviation: A Metaphorical Study on Aircraft Maintenance Students
Just Culture, a sub-dimension of safety culture, has been a prominent and debated topic in aviation safety in recent years.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Performance PRISM: A Comprehensive Framework For Performance Measurement In Aircraft Maintenance
Aircraft maintenance is governed by rigorous safety requirements and high operational complexity, demanding robust performance measurement frameworks to ensure optimal maintenance practices.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗