LAX03IA137
2003-04-10 · Oakland, California, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport OAK
Current FAA registration · N676FE
- Make / Model
- AIRBUS INDUSTRIE A300 F4-605R
- Year of manufacture
- 1998 · 5 years old at event
- Engine
- GE CF6-80 SERIES
- Seats / Engines
- 380 seats · 2 engines
- Last airworthiness date
- 19980824
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A8F284
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the failure of the 1R evacuation slide to inflate because the transport-locking pin had not been removed from the regulator during the slide's installation on the 1R door. The cause of the cabin/cockpit smoke was contamination of the air conditioning packs.
Factual narrative
On April 10, 2003, at 1350 Pacific daylight time, an Airbus A300F4-605R, N676FE, declared an emergency due to smoke in the cockpit during the takeoff climb out from the Metropolitan Oakland International Airport (OAK), Oakland, California. Federal Express (FedEx) operated the nonscheduled domestic cargo airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 121. The airplane was not damaged. The two airline transport certificated pilots were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the cross-country flight, and an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan had been filed. The flight departed Oakland at 1330, with a scheduled destination of Denver International Airport (DEN), Denver, Colorado. In the captain's written statement he indicated that during climb out he and the first officer smelled an acrid smoke followed immediately by the illumination of the MAIN DECK CARGO FIRE light, as well as the audio tone (bell). They conducted the emergency procedures, declared an emergency, and turned back to land at Oakland. While on the downwind leg, the MAIN DECK CARGO FIRE light went out. However, on final, the MID 2 LOOPS A and B illuminated. The captain stated that after landing, the flight crew accomplished the GROUND EMERGENCY EVACUATION procedures. He indicated that the 1R door slide did not inflate automatically or manually. In the first officer's written statement he indicated that during the evacuation he opened the 1R door. The door opened and the evacuation slide partially deployed; however, it did not inflate. The captain made several unsuccessful attempts to inflate the slide with the manual inflation handle. The first officer further stated that he and maintenance personnel checked the door during the preflight at Oakland. FedEx attributed the smoke to oil and another fluid, possibly glycol, contaminating the air-conditioning packs. Maintenance personnel found the number 1 and 2 water coalescer separator bags covered in a dark fluid. They replaced the APU load compressor, along with the two water coalescer separator bags. They completed a ground run of the airplane with no discrepancies noted. According to a maintenance person who arrived with a pay mover to move the airplane back to the FedEx facility, when he arrived on-scene he saw that the emergency slide had been deployed and was hanging against the fuselage from its girt bar, and was deflated. He went inside the airplane and a crewmember pointed, with a flashlight, where smoke had been. He observed a "white smoke low to the floor three quarters down the fuselage, smoke was minimal and motionless, [he] did not observe any smell of smoke." FedEx employees took several pictures of the incident slide after it had been removed from the airplane and placed into a maintenance vehicle. The pictures indicated that the slide's inflation bottle was still fully pressurized and that internal components from the inflation bottle's regulator had been removed. A Safety Board investigator interviewed numerous maintenance employees who had contact with the slide. Two of the employees recalled seeing the transport-locking pin (with a red streamer) with the incident slide on the back of the maintenance truck. The incident slide was torn down at the manufacturer's facility, and they noted no discrepancies that would have prevented the slide's inflation during the evacuation. According to the manufacturer, damage to the slide's girt in the area of the manual inflation handle was consistent with the transport locking pin being installed in the inflation bottle's regulator at the time of the slide's deployment. During climb out, the fight crew declared an emergency due to smoke in the cockpit and returned to the departure airport for a normal landing, after which the emergency evacuation slides failed to inflate. The flight crew said that they smelled an acrid smoke followed immediately by the illumination of the MAIN DECK CARGO FIRE light and the audio tone (bell). They conducted the emergency procedures, declared an emergency, and turned back for landing. On the downwind leg the MAIN DECK CARGO FIRE light went out; however, on final approach, the MID 2 LOOPS A and B illuminated. After landing the flight crew attempted to evacuate via the 1R emergency slide; however, it did not inflate. The first officer said that he was able to open the door, and that they made several unsuccessful attempts to manually inflate the slide without success. Post incident examination found that the slides' inflation bottle was fully pressurized. Two maintenance personnel noted that the transport-locking pin was with the slide when it was removed from the airplane. The slide was disassembled for inspection at the manufacturer's facility. No discrepancies were found that would have prevented the slide from inflating. Damage was found to the slide's girt bar in the area of the manual inflation handle that was consistent with the transport-locking pin being installed in the inflation bottle's regulator at the time of the slide's deployment. The cause of the smoke was determined to be oil or other fluid contamination of the air-condition packs. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2003_LAX03IA137.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.