LAX04LA047
2003-11-16 · Visalia, California, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport VIS
N52AM has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (ASHLEY MARQUARDT ASH-11), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
a loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
On November 16, 2003, at 2015 Pacific standard time, a Beech A36TC, N52AM, lost engine power during a touch-and-go takeoff from the Visalia Municipal Airport (VIS), Visalia, California, and collided with obstacles The pilot was operating the airplane, which was registered to a private company of the pilot's, under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91. The commercial pilot sustained minor injuries; the airplane sustained substantial damage. The flight departed the Santa Maria Airport (SMX), Santa Maria, California, about 1930, for the cross-country personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) coordinator reported that the pilot was doing touch-and-go takeoffs and landings at Visalia. After takeoff, the pilot retracted the gear and the engine sputtered and quit. The mixture, throttle, and propeller were all in the full forward position. The airplane then touched down hard on the runway, and a wing separated after colliding with runway approach lights. The pilot heard a clicking sound coming from the engine compartment while the master switch was on. At the accident scene, the inspector found 1/4-tank of fuel in the left main tank; the right main fuel tank was breached. Although he could not visually verify the fuel in the tip tanks, he could hear "sloshing" when the right tip tank was moved. He could not hear "sloshing" in the left tip tank. The fuel selector was positioned to the left main tank. The pilot's certified flight instructor (CFI) was interviewed by the National Transportation Safety Board investigator-in-charge. The CFI stated that he departed Visalia alone around 0800 the morning of the accident with full fuel tanks. He flew to Paso Robles where he picked up the owner. They then flew to Merced, where the owner was dropped off to pick up his vehicle. The CFI then flew the airplane back to Visalia. Total time of the flight was 2.3 hours. That night, the owner returned to Visalia with his vehicle and then flew alone to Santa Maria. He then flew back to Visalia and upon landing, he decided to do a go-around. During the go-around the engine lost power. The day prior, the owner and CFI were flying the airplane and it was noted that one of the tip tanks was not feeding fuel to the engine properly. The CFI could not remember which one. When one of the tip tanks was used, the engine lost power. The CFI did not use the tip tanks the day of the accident, nor did he feel that the owner would. In a phone conversation on March 22, 2004, the owner reported that the airplane was fueled by the CFI, prior to the departure from Visalia. The owner did not refuel the airplane again that day. He further reported that the flight from Visalia to Santa Maria, then back to Visalia, was about 2 hours duration. During the flights, the owner flew at altitudes 8,000 feet mean sea level (msl) and below. During cruise flight, he would routinely lean the mixture and use the tip tanks. The pilot calculated his fuel burn rate using a fuel burn of 20 gallons per hour. According to the airplane manufacturer, the airplane holds 80 gallons of fuel, 74 gallons are usable. Tip tanks were installed on the airplane on October 27, 1987 under a Major Alteration and Repair, FAA Form 337. Each tank held 20 gallons of fuel. The recommended cruise power performance chart for the airplane indicates a fuel burn rate of approximately 15 gallons per hour. Using this fuel burn rate, 64.5 gallons of fuel would have been used during the flight. This calculation does not include the additional fuel required during the takeoff climbs. The accident occurred during the sixth takeoff. A post accident examination of the engine and the fuel system components did not reveal any pre-impact malfunctions. The airplane landed hard and collided with airport lighting after the engine lost power during a go-around procedure. Earlier that day, the pilot's flight instructor filled the airplane's fuel tanks and flew for 2.2 hours. The pilot then flew the airplane for approximately 2 hours without adding additional fuel. The power loss occurred during the sixth takeoff that day. Post accident examination did not reveal any anomalies with the airframe or engine. According to the manufacturer, the airplane holds 80 gallons of fuel, with 74 gallons that are usable. The two tip tanks on the airplane hold 20 gallons each, for a total system capacity of 120 gallons. The left tank was 1/4 full at the accident scene; the fuel selector was positioned to the left tank. A post accident examination of the engine and the fuel system components did not reveal any pre-impact anomalies. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2003_LAX04LA047.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…