LAX04LA206
2004-05-13 · Carson City, Nevada, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport CXP
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's failure to maintain directional control during an aborted touch-and-go landing.
Factual narrative
On May 13, 2004, about 0700 Pacific daylight time, a Piper PA-28-180, N7584W, collided with a wall after an aborted touch-and-go landing from Carson Airport, Carson City, Nevada. The owner, who lent the airplane to the pilot, was operating it under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91. The student pilot, the sole occupant, sustained serious injuries. The airplane sustained substantial damage. The local solo instructional flight departed Carson City about 0645. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) accident coordinator interviewed a witness who observed the airplane during landing and takeoff. He stated that the airplane appeared to make a low approach. After what appeared to be a go-around or a bounce on landing, the pilot added power and drifted to the left of the runway's centerline. The airplane became airborne and departed the runway. The airplane had some pitch oscillations, and the pilot began to lower the nose. The airplane continued to fly over the taxiway, clearing the airport boundary fence. It crossed over a road, clipping trees in the median, and collided with a cement wall and shed on the other side of the wall. The pilot held a student pilot certificate issued June17, 2003. He soloed on April 16, 2004. He had about 45 total hours and about 3 hours solo. Technicians examined the wreckage June 2, 2004, at a secure facility at the Carson City Fire Department, under the supervision of the FAA. The right wing partially separated from the fuselage. Recovery personnel completely removed it, and cut the aileron cables. Except for that, control continuity was confirmed to all controls. The flaps were retracted and the fuel selector was to the left tank. Fueling records at El Aero Services, Inc., established that the airplane was last fueled on April 26, 2004, with the addition of 33.5 gallons of 100LL aviation fuel. Fuel was present at the accident site; however, the tanks were breached and a quantity could not be determined. The last annual was on May 10, 2004. The last annual conducted prior to that was on May 9, 2001. The closest official weather observation station was Reno, Nevada (RNO), which was 18 nautical miles (nm) north of the accident site. An aviation routine weather report (METAR) for RNO was issued at 0656. It stated: winds from 300 degrees at 5 knots; visibility 10 miles; skies 25,000 feet few; temperature 8 degrees Celsius/Fahrenheit; dew point 2 degrees Celsius/Fahrenheit; altimeter 30.15 inHg. The pilot failed to submit a Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report (NTSB form 6120.1/2). The airplane collided with obstacles after an aborted touch-and-go landing. A witness stated that the airplane appeared to make a low approach and either bounced on touchdown or initiated an aborted landing from a very low altitude. The pilot added power and drifted to the left of the runway's centerline. The airplane became airborne and continued to diverge from the runway. The airplane experienced some pitch oscillations, and the pilot began to lower the nose. The airplane continued to fly over the taxiway, clearing the airport boundary fence. It crossed over a road, clipping trees in the roadway median, and collided with a cement wall and shed on the other side of the wall. The pilot held a student pilot certificate issued June 17, 2003. He had about 45 total hours and about 3 hours solo time. During an examination of the wreckage, it was determined that the flaps were retracted, and the fuel selector was positioned to the left tank. Except for where the aileron cables were cut during recovery, control continuity was confirmed to all primary and secondary flight controls. Fuel was present at the accident site; however, the tanks were breached and a quantity could not be determined. The aviation routine weather report (METAR) for the closest weather reporting station stated that the winds were from 300 degrees at 5 knots. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2004_LAX04LA206.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…