LAX08IA032
2007-12-04 · Fresno, California, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport FCH
Current FAA registration · N805EH
- Make / Model
- ROBINSON HELICOPTER R22 BETA
- Engine
- LYCOMING 0-320 SERIES (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 2 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19930708
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AAF4DC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Failure of the tail rotor system support bracket during landing.
Factual narrative
On December 4, 2007, at 1455 Pacific standard time, a Robinson Helicopter Company (RHC) R22 Beta, N805EH, experienced a flight control malfunction as it touched down during a practice hover autorotation at Fresno Chandler Executive Airport (FCH), Fresno, California. Mazzei Flying Service, Inc., operated the helicopter under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91, as a training flight. The helicopter was not damaged. The Certified Flight Instructor (CFI) and student were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local area instructional flight that departed the Fresno Yosemite International Airport (FAT), at 1405. No flight plan had been filed. In the CFI’s written report he reported that while on approach for the third hover autorotation, he noted a slight wind shift and instructed the student to do a pedal turn into the wind. The CFI reported that the student had done a good job, with minimal drift, a flat set down, and "good collective cushion." The CFI had been following the student on the flight controls and noted no unusual control inputs for the maneuver. As the helicopter settled onto the ground, with the student inputting right anti-torque pedal to compensate for the loss of engine torque, the CFI heard a loud 'snap’ from the floor area of the student's side (right side) of the helicopter. The CFI attempted to neutralize the anti-torque pedals, and found that they were stuck in place with the right pedal in the forward position. He reduced engine rpm’s to 75 percent, and again attempted to slowly move the pedals, but they seemed stuck. He instructed the student to begin the shut down procedures. Following a normal shutdown, they exited the helicopter and began an inspection as to the cause of the stuck right anti-torque pedal. The student pilot pointed out broken metal structure adjacent to the restraining block that retains the anti-torque pedals. The CFI reported that it appeared to be the actual metal structure that the entire pedal assembly bolts to. An inspection of the helicopter by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the operator's maintenance personnel revealed that the right-hand support bracket (part number A359-2) of the tail rotor control system had failed. The operator reported that the helicopter has a total airframe time of about 13,000 hours.
TESTS AND RESEARCH
The right-hand support bracket was inspected by the RHC laboratory. RHC had been notified of other failed support brackets on the R22 with over 7,500 hours in service. As a result, the support bracket was redesigned by RHC by increasing the thickness of the material. RHC also changed the overhaul procedures that require the A359-1 and -2 supports to be replaced at overhaul for all R22 and R44 helicopters. RHC also issued service bulletin (SB) SB-97 for the R22 and SB-63 for the R44, which require the addition of a safety tab on the older thinner support brackets. Just as the helicopter touched down while performing a hovering autorotation, the certified flight instructor (CFI) heard a loud 'snap’ coming from the right side. The CFI took the controls from the student and attempted to neutralize the anti-torque pedals, but reported that they were stuck in place, with the right pedal in the forward position. He reduced the engine rpm’s to 75 percent, and attempted to move the pedals to no avail. At that point, he instructed the student to start the shutdown procedures. Following a normal shutdown, they exited the helicopter, and began to inspect the cause of the stuck anti-torque pedal. Both the CFI and student observed a broken metal structure adjacent to the restraining block that retains the anti-torque pedals. The CFI reported that it appeared to be the actual metal structure that the entire pedal assembly bolts to. The helicopter inspection revealed that the right-hand support bracket (part number A359-2) of the tail rotor control system had failed. The operator reported that the airframe had a total time of 13,000 hours. The helicopter manufacturer reported that they had been aware of other failed support brackets on helicopters with over 7,500 hours in service. As a result, the manufacturer increased the thickness of the support bracket material, and changed their overhaul procedures requiring replacement of the A359-1 and -2 support brackets at overhaul for all R22 and R44 models. The manufacturer also issued service bulletin (SB) SB-97 for the R22 and SB-63 for the R44, which require the addition of a safety tab on the older thinner support brackets. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2007_LAX08IA032.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…