NTSB CAROL · Event
Event LAX94LA202
Registry · N6524U
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
MOONEY M20C
Year of manufacture
1962 · 32 years old at event
Engine
LYCOMING O&VO-360 SER (180 hp)
Seats / Engines
4 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19621017
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A8971F
Registrant of record
PANGOAVIA INC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
THE FAILURE OF THE PILOTS TO ASSURE THAT AMPLE FUEL WOULD BE AVAILABLE TO REACH THE AIRPORT. THE GENERATOR FAILURE AND AN INOPERATIVE FUEL QUANTITY GAGE WERE CONTRIBUTING FACTORS.
Factual narrative
On April 23, 1994, about 1245 hours mountain standard time, a Mooney M20-C, N6524U, collided with terrain during a forced landing at the Page Municipal Airport, Page, Arizona. The airplane was being operated as a visual flight rules (VFR) cross- country instructional flight to Flagstaff, Arizona, when the accident occurred. The airplane, owned and operated by the second pilot, sustained substantial damage. The certificated commercial pilot/flight instructor (first pilot) sustained minor injuries. A certificated private pilot (second pilot) was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. A VFR flight plan was filed for the flight. The flight originated at Salt Lake City Airport (U42), Salt Lake City, Utah, about 0915 hours. The first pilot reported that about 1205 hours over Kanab, Utah, the airplane's electrical system quit working. The pilots decided to divert to Page, Arizona, where maintenance facilities were located. Over the Page Airport, the second pilot, who had been flying the airplane, began a descent with the engine throttled back to 12 inches of manifold pressure and utilizing carburetor heat. The fuel selector was positioned on the right tank during the descent. About 800 feet above the ground, the second pilot attempted to add power and discovered that the engine had quit. Emergency procedures failed to restart the engine. The first pilot took over control of the airplane and landed in soft, sandy terrain about 300 feet short of runway 25. During the landing, the airplane received damage to the right wing, right main landing gear, and engine. National Transportation Safety Board investigators requested that the Page Airport manager document the airplane's condition before it was recovered. The manager reported that the nose wheel and right main landing gear collapsed. The right main gear strut penetrated the upper surface of the wing, aft of the rear fuel tank bulkhead. There was no evidence of a fuel leak. Examination of the left wing fuel tank revealed that it contained 1.5 inches of fuel with the wings tipped downward toward the right wing. The right wing fuel tank contained residual fuel. After the aircraft was recovered, an airworthiness inspector, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Scottsdale Flight Standards District Office, examined the airplane on May 26, 1994. He reported that the engine started and ran normally on a test stand. The engine-driven generator did not produce any electrical power. The pilot did not include any airframe or engine accumulated time-in-service in the pilot/operator report. The pilot did include a receipt for the purchase of 9.8 gallons 100LL fuel on April 22, 1994. The pilot indicated that the airplane's fuel tanks were full prior to departure. The airplane has a fuel capacity of 48 gallons. THE AIRPLANE OWNER WAS CONDUCTING A CROSS-COUNTRY FLIGHT ACCOMPANIED BY A FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR FOR AN AIRPLANE CHECK-OUT. ABOUT 3 HRS AFTER DEPARTURE, THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM FAILED, AND THE PILOTS DIVERTED TO PAGE. ABOUT 40 MIN LATER, THE FLIGHT ARRIVED OVER THE AIRPORT AND DESCENDED TO ENTER A DOWNWIND LANDING PATTERN. WHEN POWER WAS ADDED, THE PILOTS DISCOVERED THAT THE ENGINE HAD QUIT. EMERGENCY PROCEDURES FAILED TO RESTART THE ENGINE. THE FUEL SELECTOR HAD BEEN POSITIONED ON THE RIGHT FUEL TANK DURING THE DESCENT. THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR TOOK OVER THE CONTROLS, AND THE AIRPLANE LANDED SHORT OF A CROSSWIND RUNWAY IN SOFT TERRAIN. A POSTCRASH INSPECTION BY THE AIRPORT MANAGER REVEALED ONLY RESIDUAL FUEL IN THE RIGHT FUEL TANK, AND 1-1/2 INCHES OF FUEL IN THE LEFT TANK WITH THE WINGS TIPPED DOWNWARD TOWARD THE RIGHT WING. THE AIRPLANE'S GENERATOR HAD FAILED. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1994_LAX94LA202.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Just Culture in Aviation: A Metaphorical Study on Aircraft Maintenance Students
Just Culture, a sub-dimension of safety culture, has been a prominent and debated topic in aviation safety in recent years.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Performance PRISM: A Comprehensive Framework For Performance Measurement In Aircraft Maintenance
Aircraft maintenance is governed by rigorous safety requirements and high operational complexity, demanding robust performance measurement frameworks to ensure optimal maintenance practices.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗