LAX96LA109
1996-02-09 · SAN JOSE, California, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport RHV
Current FAA registration · N6321M
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 152
- Year of manufacture
- 1980 · 16 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING 0-235 SERIES (115 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 2 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19801009
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A847B1
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the student pilot's improper use of the rudder control and resultant failure to maintain directional control of the airplane during the landing rollout. Factors relating to the accident were: the student allowed the airspeed to be excessive during the approach/landing, and the soft terrain.
Factual narrative
On February 9, 1996, at 1534 hours Pacific standard time, a Cessna 152, N6321M, operated by Wings Over California, nosed over upon landing on runway 31L at the Reid-Hillview of Santa Clara County Airport, San Jose, California. The airplane was substantially damaged and the student pilot was not injured during the solo instructional flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The flight originated from San Jose at 1510. The operator verbally reported that at the time of the accident, the student pilot was practicing landings and lost directional control. The operator also reported that the student pilot had approximately 19 hours of total flying experience which included about 3 hours of solo flight time. The student pilot reported that when he turned onto final approach he was "a little bit high," so he pitched down "to make a steeper approach." This action increased the airspeed to about 70 knots. During touchdown, the longitudinal axis of the airplane was oriented left of the runway's centerline. The student pilot further reported that "there was no time to correct" the situation. The right rudder was applied, and the airplane veered right. Then, the left rudder was applied and the airplane veered too far left and entered a grassy field. After rolling about 100 feet, the nose gear sunk into the soft mud, and the airplane nosed over. He report no mechanical problems. The student pilot reported that when he turned onto final approach to land, the airplane was high. He took corrective action by lowering the nose to make a steeper approach. This resulted in increased airspeed. During touchdown, the airplane was left of the runway centerline. The student reported that right rudder was applied, and the airplane veered right; then left rudder was applied, but the airplane veered too far left and entered a grassy field. Subsequently, the nose gear sank into soft mud, and the airplane nosed over. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1996_LAX96LA109.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…