LAX97LA061
1996-11-21 · FLAGSTAFF, Arizona, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Current FAA registration · N630N
- Make / Model
- HUGHES 369F
- Year of manufacture
- 1984 · 12 years old at event
- Engine
- ROLLS-ROYC 250-C47 SER (650 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20230124
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A83EE8
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's inattention to the altitude and inadvertent late entry into an autorotation maneuver below the established minimum test altitude with a helicopter operating at maximum gross weight in a high density altitude environment that led to a subsequent hard landing. Contributing were the lack of positive communications between ground test personnel and the pilot regarding the low altitude, and the lack of accurate in-flight and ground altimeter equipment.
Factual narrative
On November 21, 1996, at 0901 hours mountain standard time, a McDonnell Douglas (MD) prototype experimental helicopter, MD-600N (NOTAR), N630N, landed hard during a local test flight at the airport in Flagstaff, Arizona. Visual meteorological conditions existed at the time. The aircraft sustained substantial damage and the pilot was not injured. This aircraft was involved in a similar accident with the same pilot at the same location during flight tests on 11/04/96 (LAX-97-L-A034). According to the operator, the test pilot was performing a series of height velocity curve autorotations at maximum gross weight (4,100 pounds) at various altitudes and at zero airspeeds between 800 to 1,000 feet above the ground (agl). During touchdown on the fourth autorotation, the helicopter contacted the runway and displaced both skids with the right skid separating from the aircraft at the brace assembly connecting bolt hole. The fuselage was buckled and cracked along the right side and the bottom of the fuselage. The investigation revealed that the three previous test point autorotations were conducted at: 1,000 feet agl at 40 knots airspeed; 1,000 feet, 0 airspeed; and at 850 feet, 0 airspeed. There were no reported problems with these tests. According to MD engineers, the first two test points had "mild touchdown rates" (less than 1.5 g's and less than 5 feet per second). The touchdown rate for the third data point indicated a 1.75 g or 5.2 feet per second. It was discovered (after the accident) that the actual entry for this test was begun at 810 feet, instead of the 850 foot intended altitude. On the fourth test point autorotation, the test pilot was to be at an entry altitude of 800 feet agl and zero airspeed. Prior to entry, the pilot radioed a standard 3 second call to the ground crew that he was about to begin the test run. According to MD ground test data personnel reviewing the instrumentation plots, the entry did not occur until 8 to 12 seconds after the pilot's initial call. During this time, the aircraft had drifted down approximately 70 to 730 feet agl. A review of the video recording indicated the helicopter contacted the runway with the aft portion of the skids. The touchdown rate was about 4.0 g's or 13.5 feet per second. The design limit for this landing gear (skid) system was 6.5 feet per second. According to the pilot, the autorotation looked very similar to the previous data point until touchdown. At touchdown, the right gear collapsed and the helicopter dropped onto its right side. He stated the touchdown speed was approximately 45 knots. According to the test data, the horizontal speed did not get above 60 knots indicated airspeed, whereas, the other previous data points had horizontal speeds over 64 knots. The test data for this autorotation indicated a speed of 52 knots at touchdown. The investigation revealed the helicopter was equipped with a standard barometric pressure altimeter and a radar altimeter that was recently calibrated to a + or - 10 feet. Neither of these altimeters provide a digital readout and the altitude seen by the pilot is the needle position (analog) on the gauge. According to MD, there were no other precision instruments available to assist the pilot with altitude readout. Ground personnel monitoring the altimeter strip chart, which they had known to be inaccurate, noticed the aircraft "drift down" about 50 feet and assumed the pilot had already lowered the collective to begin the test after he had made the 3 second call. They did not inform the pilot of their observations. As a result of this accident and others, MD reduced the maximum operating gross weight to 3,650 pounds and installed a digital altimeter in the cockpit. The McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company has claimed an exemption from public disclosure of the information contained in their accident report as privileged and confidential. The helicopter was being flight tested to validate certification criteria for height velocity curves at a maximum gross weight and zero airspeed at a high density altitude airport. On the fourth test profile, the pilot allowed the aircraft to descend below the target altitude of 800 feet agl by almost 70 feet. The ground test engineers observed the drift down and didn't advise the pilot because they assumed he had already begun the autorotation after he had made the 3 second call, and also they believed their ground equipment was inaccurate. The pilot delayed the autorotation for about 8 to 12 seconds and then lowered the collective. The aircraft landed hard exceeding the maximum load for the landing gear system. The horizontal speed at touchdown was 52 knots instead of the target speed of 65 knots. The test helicopter was equipped with standard analog altimeters with pointers that have a lag time instead of the more accurate real time digital altimeters. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1996_LAX97LA061.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…