LAX99LA265
1999-08-05 · COALINGA, California, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport C80
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The flight instructor's failure to maintain a sufficient airspeed to compensate for the known wind shear condition, which resulted in a failure to maintain runway alignment and a hard landing. The flight instructor's inadequate supervision of the flight was also causal.
Factual narrative
On August 5, 1999, at 2015 hours Pacific daylight time, a Piper PA-28-140, N6814W, veered off the runway and collided with ground obstructions while landing at the New Coalinga Municipal Airport, Coalinga, California. The aircraft, rented from a private individual, was substantially damaged. Neither the airline transport pilot/certified flight instructor nor the dual student pilot were injured. The local instructional flight was conducted under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91, and originated from the Coalinga Airport about 1915. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The flight instructor reported that he and the student pilot were practicing a simulated forced landing to runway 30. He stated that their designated touchdown point was about 1,000 feet down the runway from the approach end. The flight instructor said that during previous portions of the flight he was aware that there was a strong gusty crosswind he estimated from 330 degrees at 10 knots at pattern altitude, although the automated weather observation service (AWOS) on the field was reporting calm winds. He reported that the three windsocks on the airport also indicated calm winds. The flight instructor reported that while on final approach the student was correcting for the crosswind condition until they descended through about 150 feet agl, where they experienced a wind shear and the aircraft veered left of the runway heading. He stated that the student initially corrected for the drift, but they experienced more wind shear, which again resulted in significant left drift. The flight instructor felt that at that point they would not be able to correct the situation and land safely. About 40 to 60 feet agl, the flight instructor took the flight controls from the student and initiated a go-around by applying full throttle while simultaneously pushing in the carburetor heat control. He reported that the engine coughed and did not produce sufficient power to sustain flight. The airplane touched down hard on the runway with the right main landing gear first, about 700 feet from the approach end, and began to drift left. The flight instructor reported that he maneuvered the airplane to the left to avoid a concrete pipe culvert and collided with the precision approach path indicator (PAPI) lights about 30 degrees off the runway heading. The airplane came to rest about 1,500 feet from the approach end of the runway. The flight instructor reported that the engine was still producing some power when the aircraft collided with the PAPI lights. He reported that he had not experienced any problems with the aircraft or engine prior to the accident. The flight instructor also stated that there were no toe brakes available on his side of the cockpit. The Piper PA-28-140 has a hand brake on the right side of the center pedestal, which is available to either pilot. A Federal Aviation Administration inspector from the Fresno, California, Flight Standards District Office examined the aircraft after the accident. He stated that the fuel tanks and carburetor bowl contained fuel, and the spark plugs displayed normal color and wear patterns. He reported that the internal baffling of the exhaust system was uncollapsed and revealed normal coloration. The inspector said that he did not find any mechanical problems with the engine or aircraft. During prior portions of the flight, the flight instructor observed that there was a strong crosswind from 330 degrees at 10 knots at pattern altitude, while the ASOS and windsocks were showing calm winds on the surface. The instructor and student then initiated a simulated forced landing to runway 30. On final approach, the student was adequately correcting for the crosswind until the airplane descended through 150 feet agl where they experienced a wind shear and the student had difficulty controlling the airplane. About 40 to 60 feet agl, the flight instructor took over the flight controls and initiated a go-around, but the airplane touched down hard on the runway and drifted left off the pavement. The flight instructor maneuvered the airplane further left to avoid a concrete pipe culvert and then collided with the PAPI lights. The airplane came to rest about 1,500 feet from the approach end of the runway. He reported that he had not experienced any problems with the aircraft or engine prior to the accident. Postcrash examination did not reveal any mechanical problems with the engine or airframe. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1999_LAX99LA265.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, wind shear, go-around). All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…