NTSB CAROL · Event
Event MIA00LA192
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the flight instructor's inadequate supervision that resulted in the dual student performing an improper landing flare/touchdown which resulted in a hard landing and overload to the nose landing gear assembly.
Factual narrative
On June 28, 2000, about 1300 eastern daylight time, a Europa XS Tri-gear, N912EA, registered to Europa Aviation Inc., and operated as a Title 14 CFR Part 91 instructional flight, landed with a missing nose gear at Lakeland, Florida. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed. The experimental aircraft incurred substantial damage, and the commercial-rated flight instructor and dual student were not injured. The flight originated in Zephyrhills, Florida, the same day, about 1210. The flight instructor stated he and the student were performing touch-and-go landings at Zephyrhills, Florida, and the student was flying the airplane. The instructor further stated that immediately on touchdown a loud bang was heard and felt, and both he and the student observed a white object depart to the right side of the aircraft, and he assumed it was a portion of the nose gear, so he applied power to perform a go-around. The instructor said that after a second approach and a look at the object, they both knew it was the wheel pant (fairing), and they assumed that the wheel was in it. He stated that he was unable to reach anyone on Zephyrhills Unicom, so they flew by the Plant City airport, and confirmed that the nose wheel was missing. He stated they then contacted Lakeland tower, and advised them of the problem, and Lakeland airport proceeded to prepare for their arrival. According to the flight instructor, during the landing he held the nose wheel off as long as possible, but upon settling, the nose strut appeared to give way, and the aircraft settled on its nose. The separated nose gear side strut assembly was retained, and sent to the National Transportation Safety Board Materials Laboratory in Washington, D. C. for metallurgical examination. The examination revealed that all fractures were typical of an overstress condition, and the pieces of the damaged landing gear assembly did not reveal the presence of dark discolored regions that are usually associated with preexisting cracking. Magnified examinations (up to 15X) showed no evidence of excessive porosity, large inclusions, weld bead buildup, or any other metallurgical or welding defects. The flight instructor stated he and the student were performing touch-and-go landings, and the student was flying the airplane. The instructor further stated that during a touch-and-go landing, immediately on touchdown, a loud bang was heard and felt, and both he and the student observed a white object depart the right side of the aircraft. The instructor said he applied power, executing a go-around, and then verified that the nose gear was missing from the aircraft. The instructor said that they then proceeded to Lakeland airport to land, and while landing the nose strut appeared to give way, and the aircraft settled on its nose. A metallurgical examination of the damaged nose landing gear assembly by the National Transportation Safety Board's Materials Laboratory revealed that all fractures were typical of an overstress condition. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2000_MIA00LA192.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗