MIA03CA125
2003-06-18 · Melbourne, Florida, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport MLB
Current FAA registration · N53352
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 172S
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A6BEB4
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's improper flare and inadequate recovery from a bounced landing. Contributing factors were the pilot's failure to maintain directional control and his failure to execute a go-around.
Factual narrative
On June 18, 2003, about 0925 eastern daylight time, a Cessna C172S, N53352, operated by FIT Aviation, LLC and registered to J3M Airops, bounced off the runway on landing and flipped over at runway 27L at Melbourne International Airport, Melbourne, Florida. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time, and no flight plan was filed. The local personal flight was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The airplane was substantially damaged. The private-pilot rated pilot was not injured. There were no injuries to anyone on the ground. The flight had originated from the Tallahassee Regional Airport, Tallahassee, Florida, at about 0725. The pilot stated to FIT Aviation, LLC, flight safety officer, the airplane touched on the right of the center line and bounced up with the engine power at idle. The airplane touched down a second time approximately 5 feet off the right side of runway 27L in the grass. The airplane continued to porpoise in the grass and bounced two more times well right of the runway. As the airplane began to porpoise for a third time, it descended toward a drainage ditch that was approximately 6 feet deep. The nose of the aircraft touched down in the middle of the ditch, causing the airplane to flip over, tail over nose. The pilot evacuated the airplane with no injuries. A witness, the flight instructor in a Piper, N616FT, stated, during landing on runway 27L crosswind conditions were such that he (instructor) assumed control from student, taxied off on C taxiway and looked toward his left, to see a C172 bounce off of 27L and begin to porpoise. The plane bounced four times. During porpoise, the tower radioed and asked Cessna 352 is there a problem, and he then saw the Cessna strike the ditch and flip over onto its back. He told ground an airplane had crashed and that they needed to dispatch fire trucks. They then taxied back to FIT ramp. Another witness, the student pilot in a Piper, N616FT, stated, from the left seat of the Piper, having just landed on MLB Runway 27L with a left crosswind, they had safely landed and taxied on taxiway C, (himself and instructor in the right seat) and were completing a training flight. Stopping just past hold the short line, he heard the instructor say "go around, go around" and he looked to his left to see a high wing, single engine, blue and white plane bounce up off what looked like its first touch down. The wheels arose about 3 feet, touched again more gently, then seemed to settle down, bouncing on what seemed to be the grass on the northern side, rolled on its wheels down a ditch and turned over, nose to tail. The instructor called ground and said the plane had crashed and emergency vehicles should probably be called; ground said they called them. After what seemed like several minutes, one person in dark clothing walked away from the plane. The pilot stated to an airport operator official that the airplane touched on the right of center line and bounced up with the engine power at idle. The airplane touched down a second time approximately 5 feet off the right side of runway 27L in the grass. The airplane continued to porpoise in the grass, bounced two more times well right of the runway. As the airplane began to porpoise for a third time, it descended toward a drainage ditch that was approximate 6 feet deep. The nose of the aircraft touched down in the middle of the ditch, causing the airplane to flip over, tail over nose. The pilot evacuated the airplane with no injuries. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2003_MIA03CA125.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…