MIA05LA063
2005-02-23 · West Palm Beach, Florida, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport F45
Current FAA registration · N207CC
- Make / Model
- CESSNA T207A
- Year of manufacture
- 1979 · 26 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR IO 520 SERIES (285 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 7 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19930419
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A1AC39
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's inadequate fuel management resulting in a loss of engine power due to fuel starvation and subsequent impact with an embankment during an emergency landing.
Factual narrative
On February 23, 2005, about 1545 eastern standard time, a Cessna T207A, N207CC, registered to Abaco Fire Rescue Association Inc. and operated by a private individual as a Title 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight made a forced landing near North Palm Beach County General Aviation Airport, West Palm Beach, Florida. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed. The private-rated pilot received no injuries and the airplane incurred substantial damage. The flight originated from the same airport, earlier that day, about 1420. The pilot stated that a maintenance facility had installed a remanufactured engine and performed an annual inspection. The facility suggested he do a quick flight around the pattern and bring the airplane back in for a post installation inspection. He completed a preflight, taxied to runway 8 right, did a normal run up and took off. He flew around the pattern, landed, and taxied back to the maintenance facility. They inspected the engine and said everything looked good. He taxied to runway 13, preformed a normal run up and took off. He climbed to 2,500 feet to begin breaking in the engine; he remained in the area for a little over an hour. He descended to 1,000 feet to enter traffic pattern for runway 13. When he began to pull the throttle back the engine lost all power. He put the throttle back to full, used the electric fuel pump, made sure the mixture was rich, trimmed to 80 knots, and turned toward runway 8 right. After multiple attempts to restart the engine he realized he was not going to make the runway. He spotted an area where it appeared to him a safe landing could be made. He advised Palm Beach Approach of the emergency, completed his checklist and landed safely. He used his cell phone to call the maintenance facility and had them contact Palm Beach Approach that he had landed safely. He removed the aircraft documents and secured the airplane. The mechanic stated that the pilot called him and said the airplane was southwest of the airport and that the engine had a loss of fuel pressure and landed on a road off the airport, adding the airplane had substantial damage. Once on scene, the mechanic found that the airplane had impacted an embankment, shearing off the nose landing gear. The pilot stated to him that he had the fuel selector on the right fuel tank and applied fuel primer trying to regain engine power, but the fuel flow remained low and the engine continued at a low RPM, or was wind-milling. The mechanic asked the pilot to put the fuel selector in the "OFF" position to prevent any fuel leakage. The mechanics were later asked to perform a fuel selector functional check and the selector's had no anomalies. The FAA inspector who responded to the accident stated that when he arrived at the scene, mechanics were at the site and the fuel selector was in the off position. He inspected the fuel tanks visually for fuel. The right wing fuel tank contained no fuel, and the mechanics drained 11 gallons of fuel from the left wing fuel tank. They examined the engine fuel manifold and only trace amounts of fuel were found. The fuel line from the firewall to the fuel pump was removed and a few drops of fuel were observed. The fuel gascolator was removed and it was only half full of fuel. When fuel was drained from the right fuel header tank little to no fuel was observed. The engine was removed from the airplane and taken to a certified engine repair facility to have a propeller strike examination performed. No discrepancies were note other than a broken motor mount. The engine was placed on an engine test stand and an engine run-up check was performed with no discrepancies noted. The pilot stated that a remanufactured engine was installed and a post installation check flight was performed for about 15 minutes in the pattern. He landed and the maintenance facility did a post flight examination of the airplane for any discrepancies; none was observed. The pilot elected to conduct a local flight to break in the engine. The pilot did an engine run up, departure, and climb to 2500 feet, where he remained for a little over one hour. While descending to traffic pattern altitude, he reduced the throttle and the engine lost power. He then placed the throttle back to full power, turned on the electric fuel pump, checked the mixture was full rich, and attempted to restart the engine several times. The pilot then realized he would not make the runway and made an off airport landing, incurring substantial damage to the airplane. When the FAA inspector and the mechanics arrived at the scene they inspected the aircraft visually for fuel and found no fuel in the right tank and 11 gallons in the left. According to the pilot the fuel selector valve was on the right tank position at the time of engine failure. Examination of the fuel lines and fuel manifold revealed little fuel. The gascolator was about half full of fuel when removed. When fuel was drained from the right header tank very little fuel was observed. The engine was examined for a propeller strike and afterwards run on a test stand; no discrepancies were noted. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2005_MIA05LA063.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel starvation, engine failure, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.