MIA06LA057
2006-02-16 · Tampa, Florida, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport TPA
N701TF has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (ZENITH CH701), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Failure of both the left main and auxiliary brake lines due to fatigue cracking, rendering directional control impossible. A contributing factor in this accident was the airport sign concrete pad.
Factual narrative
On February 16, 2006, at 1647 eastern standard time, a Cessna 525A, N701TF, registered to and operated by Zinc Acquisitions LLC, and piloted by an airline transport-certificated pilot, experienced a loss of directional control and subsequent collapse of the nose landing gear during the landing roll at Tampa International Airport, Tampa, Florida. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The executive/corporate flight was being conducted under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 91, and an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan had been filed and activated. The pilot and four passengers were not injured. The cross-country flight originated approximately 1600 from Marco Island Airport, Marco Island, Florida, and was en route to Tampa. The pilot stated that the flight to the destination airport was uneventful until landing. He landed on runway 18L, and after touchdown on all landing gears, he placed the flap selector handle to the ground flap position and applied the brakes. The airplane "swerved" to the right which he corrected back to the runway centerline. He applied the normal brakes again and the airplane again "swerved" to the right. He again corrected back to the runway centerline and applied the normal brakes the third time. The airplane again "swerved" to the right and he applied the emergency brake. The airplane departed the right side of the runway, and the nose landing gear contacted the concrete pad of a runway marker sign, causing separation of the nose landing gear. The airplane came to rest and all occupants exited the airplane. FAA inspector reported finding hydraulic fluid covering the left main landing gear. He said the main and auxiliary left brake lines were both fractured, and the right main landing gear tire was "shredded off the wheel." According to NTSB's Materials Laboratory Factual Report, "The [left] brake line transmits hydraulic fluid and the auxiliary brake line transmits compressed nitrogen between two bulkheads under the wing. The left hand brake line was fractured near its mid point and the auxiliary brake line was fractured adjacent to the flared inboard end. Microscopic examination of the left brake line revealed "the fracture mode over most of the break was fatigue cracking." Microscopic examination of the left auxiliary brake line revealed a fracture plane "perpendicular to the length of the line, and no overall deformation was noted in the tube adjacent to the fracture, features consistent with fatigue cracking that propagated most of the way through the tube before final separation." According to a statement submitted by an FAA airworthiness inspector, he reviewed the airplane's maintenance records back to its date of manufacture, and "did not locate any removal or replacement of left main landing gear brake line part numbers 6317013 or 6317014-13." The pilot landed on runway 18L. During the landing rollout, the airplane "swerved" to the right with application of brakes. The pilot corrected back to the runway centerline with rudder. He applied brakes again and the airplane again "swerved" to the right. He again corrected back to the runway centerline and applied the brakes a third time. The airplane again "swerved" to the right. He then applied the emergency brake. The airplane departed the right side of the runway and struck the concrete pad of a runway marker sign. An FAA inspector reported finding hydraulic fluid covering the left main landing gear. He said the main and auxiliary left brake lines were both fractured, and the right main landing gear tire was "shredded off the wheel." According to NTSB's Materials Laboratory Factual Report, the brake line transmits hydraulic fluid and the auxiliary brake line transmits compressed nitrogen. Both brake line fractures were the result of fatigue cracking. No mechanical or other damage was evident on the exterior of the line in the initiation area. Maintenance records dating back to the airplane's date of manufacture revealed the brake lines had never been removed or replaced. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2006_MIA06LA057.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…