MIA93IA168
1993-08-02 · MIAMI, Florida, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport MIA
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
THE IMPROPER INSPECTION OF THE ENGINE CORE COWLING, WHICH RESULTED IN FATIGUE CRACKS IN THE FORWARD INBOARD HINGE SUPPORT STRUCTURE TO GO UNDETECTED. THIS RESULTED IN THE HINGE SEPARATING AND THE COWLING SEPARATING IN FLIGHT.
Factual narrative
On August 2, 1993, at 1841 eastern daylight time, a Boeing 707-341, N107BV, operated by Fast Air Carrier, Ltd., as Aero Peru flight 014, 14 CFR Part 129, non-scheduled international cargo service from Miami, Florida, to Lima, Peru, suffered loss of the no.1 engine core cowling during takeoff from Miami International Airport. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and an instrument flight rules flight plan was filed. The aircraft received minor damage and the three flight crewmembers were not injured. The flight was originating at the time of the incident. The captain wrote in an irregularity report to the company that the no. 1 engine cowling separated on takeoff. They dumped 67,500 pounds of fuel and returned to Miami International Airport for landing. Post incident examination of the aircraft by the NTSB indicated the no. 1 engine core cowling had separated and was found on the runway. The inboard and outboard portions of the cowling were held together by the latching system. All latches were closed. The inboard forward core cowling hinge had separated from the cowling and was still mounted on the aircraft. Metallurgical examination of the separated core cowling components was performed by Frank P. Zakar, Materials Engineering, NTSB, Washington, D.C. The support structure for the inboard forward cowling hinge had separated due to fatigue cracking. (See attached Metallurgist's Factual Report.) The cowling was installed on the aircraft during installation of an engine hush kit. The manufacturer of the cowling system requires that the cowling hinge support structure be inspected for cracks each 300 flight hours. (See attached maintenance manual pages.) At the time of the incident the aircraft was being operated by Fast Air Carrier, Ltd. as a nonscheduled international cargo flight for Aero Peru. The flight was using an Aero Peru flight number. According to Mr. George L. Wellington, Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division, U.S. Department of Transportation, Fast Air Carrier, Ltd. did not hold appropriate DOT authority to operate the flight on behalf of Aero Peru. The captain held a U.S. airline transport pilot certificate, issued on the basis of a foreign pilot certificate, valid for U.S. registered civil aircraft B-707 leased to MAS Air Cargo. The captain did not have a valid certificate to operate B-707 aircraft for Fast Air Cargo, Ltd. The captain was not listed on U.S. FAA records as an employee pilot for Fast Air Cargo Ltd. The first officer held a U.S. FAA certificate valid for Fast Air Cargo, Ltd. B-707 operations. The flight engineer did not hold a U.S. FAA certificate valid for Fast Air Cargo Ltd. B-707 operations. The aircraft operator did not file an NTSB incident report as requested by the NTSB and as required by NTSB regulation. FLIGHT EXPERIENCED LOSS OF THE NUMBER ONE ENGINE CORE COWLING SHORTLY AFTER LIFTOFF. METALLURGICAL EXAMINATION OF THE SEPARATED COWLING INDICATED THE INBOARD FORWARD COWLING HINGE SUPPORT STRUCTURE HAD FAILED DUE TO FATIGUE. THIS ALLOWED THE COWLING TO OPEN AND THEN SEPARATE FROM THE ENGINE. THE HINGE REMAINED IN PLACE ON THE AIRCRAFT AFTER THE COWLING SEPARATED. THE MANUFACTURER OF THE COWLING, WHICH IS PART OF AN ENGINE HUSH KIT, REQUIRES THE HINGE SUPPORT STRUCTURE BE INSPECTED FOR CRACKS EACH 300 FLIGHT HOURS. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1993_MIA93IA168.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.