NTSB CAROL · Event
Event MIA94IA110
Registry · N59412
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
VELOCITY VELOCITY FGE
Year of manufacture
1998
Engine
AMA/EXPR UNKNOWN ENG
Seats / Engines
2 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20041216
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A7AED9
Registrant of record
LONG GREGORY B
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The total failure of the left main landing gear door actuator fitting due to fatigue cracking in the fitting. Contributing to the accident was inadequate written inspection procedures by the aircraft manufacturer.
Factual narrative
On April 2, 1994, about 1439 eastern standard time, a Boeing 727-243, N59412, registered to Wilmington Trust Company Trustee, leased to and operating as Continental Airlines Flight 1447, on a 14 CFR Part 121 scheduled domestic passenger diverted from the planned destination airport, and landed at Orlando International Airport with the left main landing gear in the up position. The airplane sustained minor damage. The airline transport pilot-in-command, first officer, flight engineer, 6 cabin attendants, and 141 passengers exited the airplane down the emergency slide from the left forward door without injury. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and an IFR flight plan was filed. The flight originated from Newark, New Jersey, about 3 hours 54 minutes before the incident. The airplane came to rest on runway 18R on the left wing leading edge slats, trailing edge flaps, left wing tip, nose tires, and the right main landing gear. Initial examination of the left landing gear system, revealed the left main landing gear door rib attachment fitting had failed preventing the landing gear from extending. Examination of the fitting by the NTSB Materials Laboratory Division, revealed the failure was due to fatigue cracking in the fitting. Review of aircraft records revealed pertinent service bulletins and airworthiness directives pertaining to the fitting had been recorded as having been completed. (For additional information see NTSB Systems Group Chairman's Factual Report, and NTSB Metallurgist's Factual Report). The digital flight data recorder (DFDR) was forwarded to the NTSB Office of Engineering for analysis. Readout of the recorder revealed the unit was working properly, but not receiving valid data from the flight data acquisition unit (FDAU), due to either a failed FDAU or a failed connection between the FDAU and DFDR. (For additional information see NTSB Digital Flight Data Recorder Factual Report). The airplane was released to Continental Airlines on April 5, 1994. WHEN LANDING GEAR EXTENTION WAS ATTEMPTED IN PREPARATION FOR LANDING, THE LEFT MAIN LANDING GEAR DID NOT EXTEND. THE PILOT MADE A GO-AROUND, COMPLETED THE REQUIRED EMERGENCY PROCEDURES, COULD NOT LOWER THE LEFT MAIN LANDING GEAR, AND DIVERTED TO ANOTHER AIRPORT. THE PILOT LANDED WITH THE LEFT MAIN LANDING GEAR IN THE RETRACTED POSITION. THE AIRPLANE SUSTAINED MINOR DAMAGE. THE 9 CREWMEMBERS AND 141 PASSENGERS WERE NOT INJURED. EXAMINATION OF THE LEFT MAIN LANDING GEAR DISCLOSED A BROKEN LANDING GEAR DOOR ACTUATOR FITTING. SEVERAL SERVICE BULLETINS HAD BEEN ISSUED OUTLINING REPETITIVE INSPECTIONS PROCEDURES AIMED AT PREVENTING SUCH FAILURES. THE OPERATOR HAD COMPLIED WITH ALL APPLICABLE SERVICE BULLETINS AND AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1994_MIA94IA110.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗