MIA97LA051
1996-12-31 · ATLANTA, Georgia, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport FTY
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
failure of the pilot to initiate an immediate climb (go-around or missed approach) after encountering fog, while on final approach to land. Darkness and fog at the end of the runway were related factors.
Factual narrative
On December 31, 1996, about 0113 eastern standard time, a Cessna 172P, N62145, registered to the Charlie Brown Flying Club, Inc., collided with an embankment while on approach to land at the Fulton County-Brown Field Airport, Atlanta, Georgia. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and an IFR flight plan was filed for the 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight. The airplane was substantially damaged and the private-rated pilot and one passenger were seriously injured. The flight originated about 2252 central standard time from the Birmingham International Airport, Birmingham, Alabama. The flight was cleared for the ILS approach and the pilot was advised that the visibility to the west was 1/4 mile and the glideslope was unavailable. The flight continued and at 0052.15, the pilot advised the controller that he was having a problem with the panel lighting and requested vectors for the final approach. The controller complied and after flying over the airport the pilot advised the controller "we need to turn on some runway lights..." The flight was vectored for the ILS and the pilot was advised to tune to the common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF) and to key his mike to activate the pilot controlled lighting. The pilot complied and a weather observer in the tower at the time heard the pilot key the mike on the CTAF and observed the runway lights at full illumination. The weather observer also reported that dense fog was located at the approach end of runway 8. The pilot then advised the controller that the runway lights were visible and he would circle back and return to land. The pilot was then cleared for a visual approach to the runway. About 3 minutes 58 seconds later, the weather observer contacted the approach controller and advised him of the dense fog at the approach end of runway 8. The controller relayed this information to the pilot who advised the controller that the runway was in sight. The controller advised the pilot to contact him when on the ground but there was no further radio transmission from the pilot. The weather observer advised the controller that he observed the airplane enter the fog but didn't observe the airplane during the landing roll. A search for the airplane was initiated and according to the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) inspector, the airplane first impacted an approach light then the upslope of a 70-foot deep embankment about 200 yards short of the runway. The airplane then slid down about 10 feet before coming to rest upright. The pilot was cleared for an ILS localizer approach at night to runway 8, & he was advised of the weather, which was in part: 200' scattered, 3200' broken, temperature & dew point 16 degrees, wind calm, visibility west through northeast 1/4 mile. The pilot reported that during the approach, his instrument panel lights were inoperative. However, he continued the approach using his dome light to illuminate his instruments. He reported that he was unable to see the runway lights. The controller vectored the flight for another approach, & advised the pilot to activate the runway lights by keying his radio on the common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF), which the pilot accomplished. The pilot then advised the controller that the runway was in sight, & he would circle back & return to land. The controller cleared the flight for a visual approach to the runway. Before landing, the pilot was advised of dense fog at the approach end of runway 8. The pilot replied that the runway was in sight. As the airplane was on short final, a weather observer saw the airplane enter an area of dense fog, but didn't see it on the landing roll. A search was initiated & the airplane was found where it impacted an upslope embankment about 200 yards short of the runway. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1996_MIA97LA051.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…