MIA98LA159
1998-05-07 · LUVURNE, Alabama, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 04A
Current FAA registration · N8218N
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA-28-140
- Engine
- LYCOMING 0-320 SERIES (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19690404
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AB380F
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The loss of engine power due to a leaking engine oil seal, resulting in a forced landing, and subsequent impact with the ground. A factor in this accident was improper maintenance and checks after rebuilding and reinstalling the airplane's engine.
Factual narrative
On May 7, 1998, about 1920 central daylight time, a Piper PA-28-140, N8218N, registered to a private owner, crashed during a forced landing, near Luvurne, Alabama, while on a Title 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed. The airplane was substantially damaged. The private-rated pilot and two passengers were not injured. The flight originated at 1800 and was en route to Headland, Alabama. The airplane was in cruise flight when the pilot reported to ATC that he had oil on the wind screen, and was losing oil pressure. According to the pilot, he had just descended to an altitude of 2,000 feet, when he noticed that the, "...fuel pressure was maxed out." He checked to see if the electric fuel pump was "ON," and it "wasn't." At this time, smoke started filling the cockpit and he opened a vent window. He then checked the oil pressure and temperature, and found them to be "okay." He then started to look for a place to land and declared an emergency with ATC, telling them that he had "smoke in the cockpit." At the same time, the pilot said, "...I could see a little bit of smoke coming from the front of the nose cowling. Within a minute, the oil started to hit the windshield, "I knew I was not going to see much longer." He asked ATC for vectors to the nearest airport, and was told that there was an airport at his 12 o'clock position, 4 miles ahead. The pilot said because of the oil on the windshield, "...I couldn't see anything, so I slipped the airplane so I could see out the left window...when I did the aircraft started to loss altitude...the oil from the left window started to flow down the left side of the airplane...now I can't see out the front...or left side window...with the airplane in a left slip I am loosing altitude. I was at 1,300 feet. I looked at my gauges...oil pressure was at 40 or 50...temp was at 190 degrees...RPM was dropping...I had to put this airplane down in a field...or it's going to crash into the trees....I saw a road...I turned the airplane to a left downwind over a lot of pine trees along the road...I was about 600 or 700 feet. I saw power lines across the road...I turned left base for the road...the stall warning came on...once the stall light came on...I had to pull back on the yoke to keep my altitude up to clear the power lines...when I did clear the lines I had to lower the nose to get back some of my airspeed...I missed my final for the road and the only thing left was a small field...I was about 60 feet...I turned the engine off...lowered the nose real quick and headed for the field. The field was too short to land in from that altitude...around 10 to 20 feet off the ground, I pulled back on the yoke to kill my airspeed, and let the airplane fall into the field...the airplane hit the ground on all three landing gears at one time, bounced about 20 to 30 feet...." The pilot stated that he had rebuilt the airplane's engine and reinstalled it on the airplane in May 1998, and had about 4 flight hours on the reinstalled engine before the accident. The pilot said that after reinstalling the engine, and on the first run up of the engine, the oil pressure "was too high." He reset the pressure from a reading of 110 psi during the first run, to a setting of 75 psi. He then flew the airplane for 10 minutes, and said "everything looked good." On the day of the accident, he flew to Selma, Alabama, and had no problem during the flight. After the accident, an examination of the engine and airframe revealed that the forward nose seal, on the engine had come loose, and was the source of the oil leak. The pilot said that the seal came loose, "...due to high oil pressure on [the] first run up." According to the FAA Inspector, the pilot said that after he made the first engine run and had readjusted the oil pressure, he should have rechecked the seals, and he did not. The airplane was in cruise flight when the pilot reported to air traffic control (ATC) that he had oil on the wind screen, and was losing oil pressure. Smoke starting filling the cockpit, and he declared an emergency with ATC. The pilot said he saw oil coming from the front of the nose cowling which hit the windshield. He asked ATC for vectors to the nearest airport, 4 miles ahead. The pilot said, because of the oil on the windshield, '...I couldn't see anything, so I slipped the airplane so I could see out the left window...when I did the aircraft started to loss altitude...the oil from the left window started to flow down the left side of the airplane...now I can't see out the front...or left side window.' He attempted to land on a road, but he saw power lines across the road. He turned left base for the road, the stall warning came on, he pulled back on the yoke to keep from hitting the power lines, and missed the turn for the final approach for the road. He then elected to land in a small field. At an altitude of about 60 feet, he turned the engine off, lowered the nose real quick, and headed for the field. The field was too short to land in from his altitude, of around 10 to 20 feet off the ground. He then pulled back on the yoke to kill the airspeed, and let the airplane fall into the field. The airplane hit the ground on all three landing gears at one time, and bounced about 20 to 30 feet. The pilot stated that he rebuilt the airplane's engine and reinstalled it on the airplane in May 1998, about 4 flight hours before the accident. After he had reinstalled the engine, he ran the engine, and found that the oil pressure 'was too high.' He readjusted the oil pressure, and then flew the airplane for 10 minutes, and he said 'everything looked good.' On the day of the accident he flew to Selma, Alabama, and had no problems during the flight. After the accident, an examination of the engine and airframe revealed that the forward nose seal, on the engine had come loose, and was the source of the oil leak. The pilot said that the seal came loose due to the 'high oil pressure.' The pilot told the FAA that after he made the first engine run, and had readjusted the oil pressure, he should have rechecked the seals, and he did not. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_MIA98LA159.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.