NYC00FA094
2000-03-19 · AKRON, Ohio, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport AKR
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's improper decision to operate the airplane with known deficiencies. A factor in this accident was the inability of the engine to attain full power for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On March 19, 2000, about 0748 Eastern Standard Time, a Beech A23, N1410L, was destroyed when it impacted houses in a residential area, shortly after takeoff from Akron Fulton International Airport (AKR), Akron, Ohio. The certificated private pilot was fatally injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan had been filed for the personal flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The airplane departed Runway 07, a 6,337 foot-long, 150 foot-wide asphalt runway. A witness near the runway stated that he looked up and saw the airplane about 10 to 15 feet above the ground, "barely climbing." He said he had observed several single engine airplanes takeoff in the past, and the accident airplane seemed "slow." He said the engine noise was constant; however, it "just didn't seem like it was at full RPM." He diverted his attention from the airplane, and within about 30 seconds, he observed a puff of smoke rising. Another witness stated that the airplane looked like it just cleared the fence which surrounds the airport. He said the airplane did not sound like any airplane he had heard in the past, "like it wasn't picking up RPM." The airplane climbed "a little," leveled off about the "height the telephone poles" and made a left turn. The airplane was heading directly towards him and descended slightly. The airplane passed over some power lines, and barley missed a maple tree or brushed it slightly. The airplane then made another left turn and continued to descend, below his field of view. This was followed by a loud "bang" which was immediately followed by rising smoke. He said the engine wasn't "missing or sputtering, it just wasn't revving up like normal." He further described the engine noise like "a truck in high gear going up a steep hill." A third witness who lived about 300 feet from the accident site stated that he looked out his window and observed the blue and white airplane below the roof-tops. He said the airplane appeared to be "gliding in," and it looked like it was maneuvering from a left turn to a right turn when it disappeared from his field of view. He then heard a loud explosion. The accident occurred during the hours of daylight approximately 41 degrees, 2 minutes north latitude, and 81 degrees, 27 minutes west longitude.
PERSONNEL INFORMATION
The pilot held a private pilot certificate with a single engine land airplane rating. According to the pilot's wife, the pilot had purchased the airplane about 7 years prior to the accident. The most recent entry in the pilot's logbook was on December 19, 1999; however, witnesses report that the pilot flew regularly. Examination of the pilot's logbook revealed that the pilot had accumulated approximately 663 hours of total fight experience as of December 19, 1999. Additionally, the pilot had flown about 100 hours, all in the accident airplane, between December 1998, and December 1999. It was estimated that the pilot flew about 90 hours during the year prior to the accident. The pilot received a biennial flight review on November 25, 1999. The pilot's most recent Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) third class medical certificate was issued on December 22, 1998.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
The airplane's most recent annual inspection was performed on April 20, 1999, at a tachometer time of 4591.20 hours. The tachometer time at the accident site was 4683.44 hours. The pilot's wife reported that the airplane's battery had been having trouble holding a charge. She believed the pilot had gone to the airport to check the battery and did not know he was planning to fly the airplane. The day before the accident, the pilot was observed by AKR airport personnel to takeoff in the accident airplane, return to his parking space, and then takeoff off again. The pilot repeated this action several times. The airframe and powerplant mechanic who performed the airplane's last annual inspection stated that accident pilot called him the day before the accident and said "the airplane wasn't developing power." He asked the pilot what the "magneto drop" was, and the pilot replied "fifty on one, and eighty on the other." The mechanic then told the pilot to "leave it on the ground," and he would look at the airplane on Monday.
METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION
An automated weather observation taken at AKR, at 0754, reported: Variable winds at 4 knots; Visibility 10 statue miles; Ceiling 5,500 feet overcast; Temperature 37 degrees F; Dewpoint 21 degrees F; Altimeter 30.17 in/hg.
WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION
The accident site was located about 1/2 mile from the departure end of the runway, and on 030-degree magnetic bearing from the airport. The airplane struck two homes and came to rest upright, on a magnetic heading of about 275 degrees. With the exception of an 8-foot section of the empennage and the outboard half of the left wing, the airplane was consumed by a post crash fire, which also destroyed the house on the north side of the wreckage. All major components of the airplane were accounted for at the accident site. Flight control continuity was confirmed from the elevator, rudder, and left aileron control surfaces to the forward cockpit area. Additionally, no breaks were found in the control cable for the right aileron. The engine was separated from it's mounts, and had sustained substantial fire damage. The oil sump, rocker box covers, and a majority of the propeller had melted. The magnetos remained attached to the engine, and could not be manipulated by hand. The engine was removed from the accident site, and examined in a nearby hangar. The top spark plugs were removed. Their electrodes were intact and light gray in color. The engine's crankshaft was not able to be rotated, and the engine was retained for further examination. The fuel selector was found in the right tank position. Additionally, it was noted that the engine's fuel injector, and electric fuel pump were consumed in the fire.
MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION
An autopsy was performed on the pilot, on March 20, 2000, by the Summit County Medical Examiners Office, Akron, Ohio. The toxicological testing report from the FAA Toxicology Accident Research Laboratory, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, was negative for drugs and alcohol for the pilot.
TESTS AND RESEARCH
On September 12, 2000, the engine was examined at Teledyne Continental Motors, Mobile, Alabama, under the supervision of the Safety Board investigator. Further examination of the engine magnetos revealed they had sustained substantial internal fire damage and could not be rotated. Due to the impact and fire damage, the magnetos internal and engine "timing" could not be determined. The engine driven fuel pump was partially melted and seized; however, the fuel pump drive coupling was intact. No evidence of a catastrophic engine failure was observed during the engine examination. The engine's internal components revealed damaged consistent with impact and fire damage. Additionally, no metallic debris was observed on the oil filter element.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The airplane wreckage was released on March 22, 2000, to a representative of the owners insurance company. The day before the accident, Saturday, the pilot was observed by airport personnel to takeoff in the accident airplane, return to his parking space, and then takeoff off again. The pilot repeated this action several times. Also, the pilot called the airframe and powerplant mechanic who performed the airplane's last annual inspection and said 'the airplane wasn't developing power.' The mechanic then told the pilot to 'leave it on the ground,' and he would look at the airplane on Monday. Witnesses who observed the airplane depart on Sunday, stated that the engine noise was constant; however, it 'just didn't seem like it was at full RPM.' The airplane 'barely cleared' the airport perimeter fence located off the departed end of the 6,337 foot long runway. The airplane made a series of descending left turns, and impacted two homes about 1/2 mile from the runway. With the exception of an 8-foot section of the empennage and the outboard half of the left wing, the airplane was consumed by a post crash fire. The engine also sustained substantial fire damage. The fuel injector and electric fuel pump were consumed in the fire. Examination of the airplane and disassembly of the engine, did not reveal evidence of any catastrophic failures. The pilot had flown the airplane about 90 hours in the year prior to the accident. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2000_NYC00FA094.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (engine failure). All research papers
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Large-eddy simulations of the NACA23012 airfoil with laser-scanned ice shapes
In this study, five ice shapes generated at NASA Glenn's Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) are simulated at multiple angles of attack (Broeren et al., J. of Aircraft, 2018).
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Multi-level Adaptation for Automatic Landing with Engine Failure under Turbulent Weather
This paper addresses efficient feasibility evaluation of possible emergency landing sites, online navigation, and path following for automatic landing under engine-out failure subject to turbulent wea…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Simulation of Liquid Rocket Engine Failure Propagation Using Self-Evolving Scenarios
Traditional probabilistic risk assessment approaches often require failure scenarios to be explicitly defined through event sequences that are then quantified as part of the integrated analysis.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Rocket engine failure detection using system identification techiques
The theoretical foundation and application of two univariate failure detection algorithms to Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) test firing data is presented.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Rocket engine failure detection using system identification techniques
The theoretical foundation and application of two univariate failure detection algorithms to Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) test firing data is presented.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM) A simulator investigation of engine failure compensation for powered-lift STOL aircraft
A piloted simulator investigation of various engine failure compensation concepts for powered-lift STOL aircraft was carried out at the Ames Research Center.