NYC01LA231
2001-09-30 · Bardstown, Kentucky, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport BRY
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's improper flare, which resulted in a nose-first, hard touchdown.
Factual narrative
On September 30, 2001, at 1300 eastern daylight time, a Let 33 glider, N3301L, was substantially damaged during landing at the Samuels Field Airport (BRY), Bardstown, Kentucky. The certificated commercial pilot was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local personal flight that departed Samuels Field. No flight plan was filed, and the flight was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to the pilot, he was planning on conducting three flights on the day of the accident. All of the flights were to be closed traffic, and the first flight was completed without incident. The pilot then departed on the second flight. After climbing above the traffic pattern altitude of 1,200 feet agl, the pilot released from the tow-plane. Once free, the pilot maneuvered the glider onto the downwind for runway 2, and radioed his position and intentions. The pilot turned base approximately 700 feet agl, and made another radio announcement. About 500 feet agl, he turned final and recalls having a good "angle" to his aiming point. About 150 to 200 feet from the aiming point and 10 feet agl, the indicated airspeed was approximately 50 knots. The pilot then shifted his attention outside the glider for the final phase of the landing. When the glider was about 3 feet agl and "near" the flare point, it started to drop "sharply." The glider touched down hard nose first on the runway, and then bounced back into the air. The pilot was able to maintain directional control while the glider made several more bounces before rolling out and coming to a stop. He then exited the glider under his own power. The pilot had approximately 300 hours of total flight experience, with 7 hours of that in the accident glider make and model. In addition, he had flown 2.5 hours in the accident glider within 30 days of the accident. Examination of the glider by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector revealed a compression wrinkle around the entire tailboom just forward of the horizontal and vertical stabilizers with part of the compression wrinkle extending along the top of the tailboom to the aft part of the cockpit. During the examination, no preimpact failures or malfunctions where identified. The pilot departed on a local close traffic glider flight. After climbing above the traffic pattern altitude of 1,200 feet agl, he released from the tow-plane. Once free, he maneuvered the glider onto the downwind for runway 2, and radioed his position and intentions. He turned base approximately 700 feet agl, and made another radio announcement. About 500 feet agl, the pilot turned final and recalls having a good "angle" to his aiming point. About 150 to 200 feet from the aiming point and 10 feet agl, the indicated airspeed was approximately 50 knots. The pilot then shifted his attention outside the glider for the final phase of the landing. When the glider was about 3 feet agl and "near" the flare point, it started to drop "sharply." The glider touched down hard nose first, and then bounced back into the air. The pilot was able to maintain directional control while the glider made several more bounces before rolling out and coming to a stop. He then exited the airplane under his own power. The pilot had approximately 300 hours of total flight experience, with 7 hours of that in the accident glider make and model. In addition, he had flown 2.5 hours in the accident glider within 30 days of the accident. Examination of the glider revealed no preimpact failures or malfunctions. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2001_NYC01LA231.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type. All research papers
- arXiv 2020 · arXiv preprint A Lean and Highly-automated Model-Based Software Development Process Based on DO-178C/DO-331
The emergence of a global market for urban air mobility and unmanned aerial systems has attracted many startups across the world.
- NASA NTRS 1995 · Conference Paper Human Factor Implications of the Eurocopter AS332L-1 Super Puma cockpit
The purpose of this paper is to identify and describe some of the human factor problems which can occur in the cockpit of a modern civilian helicopter.
- AOPA Air Safety Institute 2024 · Annual report (Nall Report) 33rd Joseph T. Nall Report — General Aviation Accidents in 2022
The annual Joseph T. Nall Report from the AOPA Air Safety Institute summarizes general aviation accidents and causal factors for calendar year 2022.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint nBMS, a Neuromorphic Battery Management System with a Silicon-Validated Spiking State-of-Charge Core for eVTOL Aircraft
State-of-charge (SoC) estimation for electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft must run on the vehicle under hard energy and certification budgets, on a duty cycle unlike anything in the…
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Multi-Domain Physics-Based MDO of Multirotor UAVs: A Deterministic Framework for Discrete COTS Sizing
Multirotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) design is governed by a tightly coupled system of non-linear equations spanning structural mechanics, electrochemistry, aerodynamics, and kinematics.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Conflict Resolution under Degraded Surveillance in Air Corridors Using Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Safe Advanced Air Mobility operations require aircraft to maintain separation when surveillance information is noisy, delayed, incomplete, or temporarily unavailable.