NYC02LA069
2002-03-08 · Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport PNE
Current FAA registration · N117NU
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA 46-350P
- Year of manufacture
- 1998 · 4 years old at event
- Engine
- P&W PT6A SERIES (500 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20010523
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A04773
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's improper recovery from a bounced landing. A factor was the pilot's failure to flare during initial touchdown.
Factual narrative
On March 8, 2002, about 0845 eastern standard time, a Piper P46T, N117NU was substantially damaged while landing at the Northeast Philadelphia Airport (PNE), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The certificated private pilot was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight that originated from Igor I. Sikorsky Memorial Airport (BDR), Bridgeport, Connecticut. An instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan had been filed for the personal flight that was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The pilot stated "...I came in a little fast and a little high, and when I touched down, I landed on the front tire and the plane porpoised. When I bounced in the air I tried to go around by applying power, but the engine took a second or 2 to spool and I didn't feel the power surge to take off again. I wasn't sure if I had had a prop strike which might have made it so the propeller could not give me enough power, or it was the slow spooling [of the engine] so I pulled the power back again. By this time I was off the runway and into the grass, which stopped the bouncing that was occurring on the runway. Once on the grass and no longer bouncing, I attempted to steer the plane back on to the runway, and that is when the landing gear collapsed...." According to an inspector from the Federal Aviation Administration, (FAA), there was damage to the flap, aileron, and wrinkles on the upper surface skin of the left wing. Both main landing gear had collapsed to the right, and the nose wheel was bent to the right. The propeller blades had damage to all four tips. After departing the runway, the airplane traveled through 380 feet of dirt and came to rest in a grassy area. In the NTSB Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report, in the section titled, "Recommendation (How Could This Accident Have Been Prevented)", the pilot reported: "I should have flared, not landed on front tire." According to the 0854 weather observation from PNE, the sky was clear, the visibility was 9 statute miles, and the winds was from 060 degrees at 5 knots. According to FAA data, runway 6 was 7,000 feet long, 150 feet wide, and had a asphalt surface. The airplane was originally delivered as a PA-46-350P. It was subsequently modified by a supplemental type certificate (STC), which replaced the reciprocating engine with a Pratt & Whitney Of Canada (PWC) PT6A-34 turboprop engine. According to the STC holder, the airplane was re-designated a P46T. The pilot reported his total flight experience as 719 hours, which included 76 hours in make and model, including 65 hours in the preceding 90 days. The airplane was landing on runway 06. The pilot reported that he was high and fast. He did not flare, and the airplane touched down, nose gear first, and bounced. The pilot added power for a go-around, and then aborted the go-around. The airplane then touched down again, veered off the left side of the runway, traveled through 380 feet of dirt and came to rest in a grassy area. Both main landing gear had collapsed to the right, and the nose landing gear was bent to the right. The left wing had wrinkles in the upper surface of the skin, as well as damage to the flap and aileron. All propeller blades had damage to the tips. Weather reported about the time of the accident included winds from 060 degrees at 5 knots, with clear skies. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2002_NYC02LA069.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…