NYC03LA172
2003-08-02 · Leonardtown, Maryland, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 2W6
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A loss of engine power due to water contamination of the fuel. A factor was the fuel cap not being secured to the tank.
Factual narrative
On August 2, 2003, at 0940 eastern daylight time, a Mooney M20B, N33EM, was substantially damaged during a forced landing after a takeoff from Duke Regional Airport (2W6), Leonardtown, Maryland. The certificated airline transport pilot received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the flight to Shannon Airport (EZF), Fredericksburg, Virginia. The personal flight was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to the pilot, the purpose of the flight was to return the airplane to Shannon to have problems with the landing gear and airspeed indicating system corrected. In a written statement, the pilot stated that he performed a preflight and run-up inspection prior to his departure, during which, he noted no anomalies. After departure from runway 29, the pilot was unable to unlock the gear latch to retract the landing gear. As he continued to try to raise the gear, at 150 feet agl, the engine surged and then lost complete power. The propeller continued to windmill, and the pilot initiated an immediate left turn to locate a suitable landing area. After he turned the airplane approximately 90 degrees, the pilot located relatively flat terrain and prepared for a forced landing. He reduced the airspeed to just above stall speed (65 mph) and kept the left wing low to absorb the impact. During the landing, the airplane stopped quickly as the right main landing gear retracted and spun the airplane to the right, about 50 degrees from the touchdown heading. In a telephone interview, the pilot stated that when the engine lost power, it sounded as if it "was not getting fuel." He reported that he last fueled the airplane about two weeks prior to the accident, at which time, he topped off the tanks. Since the fueling, he made two flights which totaled about 40 minutes in duration. The pilot also stated that he sumped the fuel tanks during the preflight inspection and noted no water or contamination. The pilot reported 7,215 hours of total flight experience, 1,153 of which were in make and model. Examination of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed that the left wing fuel filler cap did not seat correctly into its fuel tank fitting. The inspector sumped the left fuel tank and observed "several ounces" of water in the fuel sample. He also took a sample of fuel from the right fuel tank, which did not contain any water. Approximately 18 gallons of fuel was drained from each fuel tank. The engine was examined by a Safety Board investigator on September 2, 2003. Examination of the engine revealed approximately one teaspoon of water in a 4-5 ounce sample of fuel observed in the carburetor bowl. Water was also observed in the engine driven fuel pump, and corrosion was noted on the pump. Impact damage sustained to the engine prevented it from being test run. A Safety Board meteorologist collected recorded precipitation totals from Patuxent River Naval Air Station, 7 miles east of 2W6, where the airplane was based, for a period extending two weeks prior to the accident. A review of this data revealed 2.3 inches of rain fell between July 19, 2003 and the day of the accident. Shortly after takeoff, at about 150 feet agl, the airplane's engine surged and then lost complete power. The pilot initiated an immediate left turn and performed a forced landing to a field. Examination of the airplane revealed that the left wing fuel filler cap did not seat correctly into its fuel tank fitting. A sample of fuel from the left tank revealed "several ounces" of water. Samples of fuel taken from the carburetor bowl and engine driven fuel pump also contained water, and corrosion was noted on the pump. A review of recorded precipitation totals from an airport 7 miles east of where the airplane was based, for a period extending two weeks prior to the accident, revealed 2.3 inches of rain had fallen in the area. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2003_NYC03LA172.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…