NYC04LA008
2003-10-13 · Cincinnati, Ohio, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport LUK
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's delayed decision to abort the takeoff, which resulted in a collision with trees.
Factual narrative
On October 13, 2003, at 1635 eastern daylight time, N4087F, a homebuilt VP 1, was substantially damaged when it impacted the ground during a forced landing after takeoff from the Cincinnati Municipal Airport - Lunken Field (LUK), Cincinnati, Ohio. The certificated commercial pilot received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the test flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to air traffic control (ATC) transcripts provided by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the pilot contacted the ground controller at Lunken Field, and requested a "taxi to two one left ah possible takeoff or at least a long run." The pilot taxied to runway 21L and performed a run-up inspection in which he noted no abnormalities. He then contacted the tower controller and stated, "..ready for takeoff ah if i can make it i will be turning left eastbound." The pilot reported that during the takeoff from runway 21L, the airplane "would not climb." As he approached the departure end of the runway, he performed a right turn to "set [the] airplane down inside [the] airport." The pilot also reported to a FAA inspector, that the engine installed in the airplane was a 1200cc Volkswagen engine and was underpowered for the airplane, as it would not climb out of ground effect. The pilot stated that most other aircraft of this model use a 1600cc Volkswagen engine. He reported no mechanical problems with the airplane or engine prior to the accident. A witness observed the airplane perform a ground roll on runway 21L for about 20 seconds, and then takeoff in a shallow climb. The airplane then appeared to fly level after reaching an altitude of no more than 50 feet. The pilot appeared to initiate a climb; however, the airplane settled back down to the runway. This sequence of climb attempts repeated about 12 times over a 2 minute period, and according to the witness, the airplane appeared "on the verge of a stall" as the nose came up. The airplane crossed the departure end of runway 21L at 30-40 feet, continued straight for another 200 yards, then went into a 15-20 degree right bank. The witness lost sight of the airplane behind trees; however he heard the airplane's power reduce to idle and then the sound of an impact. Until the reduction of power, the ending sounded like it was "running smooth and at full power." Examination of the airplane by the FAA inspector revealed control continuity from the cockpit to the flight controls. Additionally, examination of the engine revealed no mechanical deficiencies. According to the inspector, the accident flight was the airplane's first flight of a 40-hour test period. The accident flight was the experimental airplane's first flight of a 40-hour test period. The pilot requested a "possible takeoff or at least a long run," from air traffic controllers at the airport, and then departed from the runway after a ground roll of about 20 seconds, in a shallow climb. The airplane leveled off after reaching an altitude of about 50 feet, and then a second climb was initiated, during which the airplane settled back down to the runway. This sequence of climb attempts repeated about 12 times until the airplane reached the end of the runway. The pilot then reduced the power and performed a forced landing to a field on the right side of the runway. The pilot reported no mechanical problems with the airplane. He stated that the airplane was equipped with a 1200cc Volkswagen engine, resulting in the airplane being underpowered, and unable to climb out of ground effect. The pilot further stated that most other aircraft of this model use a 1600cc Volkswagen engine. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2003_NYC04LA008.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…