NYC04LA209
2004-09-11 · Oxford, Connecticut, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport OXC
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's improper recovery from a bounced landing.
Factual narrative
On September 11, 2004, about 2040 eastern daylight time, a Cirrus SR-22, N579AL, was substantially damaged while landing at the Waterbury-Oxford Airport (OXC), Oxford, Connecticut. The certificated private pilot and three passengers were not injured. Night visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the personal flight that originated at Morristown Municipal Airport (MMU), Morristown, New Jersey. No flight plan was filed, and the flight was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to the pilot, he arrived at the departure airport approximately 1930, checked weather via computer, then performed a preflight inspection of the airplane. The pilot performed a preflight inspection, boarded his passengers, and started the engine. During the taxi, runup, and takeoff, the pilot noticed no anomalies with the airplane. Once airborne, the pilot received flight following advisories from air traffic control, and the flight progressed without incident. Approximately 8 to 10 miles from his destination, the pilot canceled flight following, and contacted the local controller. Approximately 1.5 miles from the airport, he set the flaps to 50 percent, and intercepted the Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) for runway 36, about 1,200 feet agl. The pilot slowed the airplane to approximately 100 knots, set the flaps to 100 percent, and continued to follow the PAPI to touchdown. The airplane touched down around 85 to 90 knots, left of centerline, and bounced once before departing the left side of the runway. With the airplane off the runway and on the grass border, the pilot decided to abort the landing. He advanced the throttle, and pitched the nose up 10 to 15 degrees above the horizon. The airplane's airspeed was approximately 70 knots, but it did not climb as expected, so the pilot aborted the go-around attempt. He closed the throttle, the airplane touched back down on the grass, and the pilot applied maximum braking. The airplane then struck a parked vehicle, and came to a stop. The pilot did not report any mechanical problems with the airplane, and felt the engine responded appropriately when he advanced the throttle. The pilot also stated that during the go-around attempt, he did not have an opportunity to raise the flaps to 50 percent. When asked how the accident could have been prevented, the pilot stated, "The go around procedure probably should not have been executed. Although the plane slid left, cutting the power would have probably resulted in [the airplane] resting in the grass." According to the Pilot's Operating Handbook for the accident airplane, the procedure for a balked landing/go-around includes applying full power, reducing the flap setting to 50 percent, and maintaining 75 to 80 knots airspeed until all obstacles are cleared. During the landing, the airplane touched down to the left of the runway centerline, and bounced once before it departed the left side of the runway. The pilot then decided to abort the landing, but did not retract the flaps from the landing position. As the airplane accelerated, the pilot felt that it was not climbing as he expected it should, so he aborted the go-around attempt. The airplane touched down again on the grass, and subsequently struck a parked vehicle during the landing roll out. When asked how the accident could have been prevented, the pilot stated, "The go around procedure probably should not have been executed. Although the plane slid left, cutting the power would have probably resulted in [the airplane] resting in the grass." Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2004_NYC04LA209.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…