NYC05LA111
2005-07-01 · West Carrollton, Ohio, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport I73
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's inadequate preflight inspection that resulted in fuel contamination and a subsequent loss of engine power. A factor related to the accident was the deteriorated fuel cap seals.
Factual narrative
On July 1, 2005, at 1040 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-28-180, N3992R, was substantially damaged during a forced landing after departing from the Moraine Airpark, West Carrollton, Ohio. The certificated private pilot received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and a visual flight rules flight plan was filed for the flight, destined for Gainesville, Georgia. The personal flight was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to the pilot, he arrived at the Moraine Airpark on June 29, 2005, and parked the airplane. On the day of the accident the airplane was fueled with 33.1 gallons of 100 low lead aviation fuel. The pilot then conducted a "thorough" preflight inspection, which included taking fuel samples from the sump drains. Upon takeoff from runway 26, the pilot smelled smoke, but elected to not abort the takeoff due to insufficient remaining runway. The airplane climbed to an altitude of 500 feet, when the pilot felt that "things just weren't right," and he elected to return to the airport. As he banked the airplane to the left, the engine suddenly lost power. The pilot then performed a forced landing, where the airplane struck trees, and subsequently impacted the ground. According to an employee at the airpark, he observed the pilot loading his baggage into his airplane, which had been tied down at the airpark for approximately 2 days. The employee then observed the airplane taxiing on the parallel taxiway towards runway 8, and subsequently conduct a high speed taxi down the runway. The airplane exited at the midfield point on the runway, and then taxi towards the run-up area for runway 26. Approximately 5 minutes later, the employee heard the airplane's engine sputter as it passed mid-field. The airplane was already airborne, and it seemed like it was having trouble climbing over the river levy, located at the departure end of the runway. After passing over the levy, the airplane disappeared from view briefly, and then appeared again. The engine sounded as though it was "straining," and was running rough. The employee then heard the pilot transmit over the radio, "emergency landing." The airplane then banked to the left, in a nose up stall attitude, and collided with trees located southwest of the runway. The employee did not recall observing any smoke or fire emitting from the airplane during the accident sequence. Examination of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector revealed that the end of one propeller blade was broken off, and the other blade was bent rearward. Examination of the left and right wing fuel filler openings displayed "heavy" corrosion. Their respective filler cap gaskets were worn and flattened, and did not form an effective seal. Review of the airplanes maintenance logbooks did not reveal any entries regarding fuel filler cap replacement. Examination of the cockpit area revealed that no circuit breakers were tripped, and no evidence of overheating or fire was observed behind the instrument panel. The fuel pump switch was observed in the "ON" position, and the fuel selector was observed in the "right tank" position. The FAA inspector examined the cabin of the airplane, and found a fuel sample device. Examination of the fuel sample device revealed loose sediment and debris in the bottom of the cup, and that it smelled of must. Fuel was observed in both tanks by the local fire department who responded to the accident. A fuel sample of approximately .1 ounce was recovered from the engine feed line. When the sample was applied to a water finding paste coupon, no contamination was noted. No fuel samples were taken from the fuel gascolator due to impact damage. The engine was removed from the airframe and placed on a test stand. The engine was started, and ran with no abnormalities noted. Due to the crankshaft being bent during the accident, the engine was only run to 700 rpm. The electric fuel pump was removed from the firewall and tested, with no abnormalities noted. Further examination of the pump did not reveal any defects or evidence of overheating. Review of recorded weather from an airport located 13 miles north of Moraine Airpark revealed that about .35 inches of rain fell on June 30, 2005. The pilot flew to the airport 2 days prior to the accident, and parked the airplane. On the day of the accident the airplane was fueled with 33.1 gallons fuel, and the pilot conducted a "thorough" preflight inspection, which included taking fuel samples from the sump drains. Upon takeoff from runway 26, the pilot smelled smoke, but elected to not abort the takeoff due to insufficient remaining runway. The airplane climbed to an altitude of 500 feet, when the pilot felt that "things just weren't right," and he elected to return to the airport. As he banked the airplane to the left, the engine suddenly lost power. The pilot then performed a forced landing, where the airplane struck trees, and subsequently impacted the ground. Prior to the accident, a witness observed the pilot conduct a high-speed taxi down the runway, exiting the runway at the midfield point, and begin to taxi towards the run-up area. Approximately 5 minutes later, the witness heard the airplane's engine sputter as it passed mid-field. The airplane was already airborne, and it seemed like it was having trouble climbing over the river levy, located at the departure end of the runway. Examination of the airplane revealed that the left and right wing fuel filler openings displayed "heavy" corrosion. Their respective filler cap gaskets were worn and flattened, and did not form an effective seal. The engine was removed from the airframe and placed on a test stand. The engine was started, and ran with no abnormalities noted. A fuel sample device was found in the wreckage. Examination of the fuel sample device revealed loose sediment and debris in the bottom of the cup, and it smelled of must, which was consistent with lack of recent use. Review of recorded weather that about .35 inches of rain fell on the day prior to the accident, while the airplane was parked outside. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2005_NYC05LA111.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel contamination, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.