NYC06IA226
2006-09-01 · Matinicus Islnd, Maine, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 35ME
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
An engine kick back of undetermined origin during engine start.
Factual narrative
On September 1, 2006, about 1230 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 206F, N8411Q, operated by Waters Aero Marine, incurred minor damage during an engine start at Matinicus Island Airport (35ME), Matinicus Island, Maine. The certificated airline transport pilot and the two passengers were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. The on-demand air taxi flight was operating on a company visual flight rules flight plan to Knox County Airport (RKD), Owls Head, Maine, under 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 135. According to the pilot, as soon as the engine began idling after start, he heard "an abnormal engine mechanical noise." He then shut down the engine and requested a mechanic. During a subsequent engine start, the mechanic confirmed the mechanical engine noise, and the engine was again shut down. Hand propping revealed that the engine would sometimes "mechanically jam," and that the alternator drive pulley would turn freely at various points during engine rotation. Further examination revealed a damaged crankshaft gear with two teeth missing, and an "abnormal wear groove on an adjoining third tooth." The Teledyne Continental IO-520-series engine was forwarded to the manufacturer for a teardown examination under National Transportation Safety Board oversight. Aside from the missing crankshaft gear teeth, no other gear damage was noted. The oil sump was removed and the two crankshaft gear teeth were recovered. The oil sump did not contain any additional debris or foreign material. Magneto timing was found to be 25 degrees before top dead center on the left and 23 degrees before top dead center on the right. Both magnetos exhibited normal impulse coupling engagement when rotated in the normal direction of rotation. Installation of the magnetos on a test bench revealed that the left magneto impulse coupling would disengage at 350 rpm and the right magneto impulse coupling would disengage at 360 rpm. A metallurgical examination of the crankshaft gear, the starter adapter gear, and the two fractured crankshaft gear teeth was performed by the engine manufacturer. According to the manufacturer's report, all evaluated metallurgical requirements were met, including core hardness, surface hardness, and case depth. Both crankshaft gear teeth exhibited signatures consistent with overload. Corresponding starter adapter gear teeth, that would have meshed with the crankshaft gear teeth during startup, exhibited "fine" cracking on the loaded side. Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM) Mandatory Service Bulletin MSB94-8C required that magneto timing be performed in accordance with manufacturer instructions every 100 hours. It also noted: "CAUTION: A single 'kick back' while cranking can cause failure of components of the cranking system. Kick back can be caused by intermittent operation of the impulse couplings." The Bulletin also noted that for the IO-520-series engine, both magnetos should be set at 22 degrees before top dead center. The engine had 167 hours since rebuild by TCM, and 10 hours since the annual/100 hour inspection. No additional information was available to determine if any maintenance or pilot actions might have resulted in a kick back. After engine start, the pilot heard "an abnormal engine mechanical noise." He shut down the engine and requested a mechanic. During a subsequent engine start, the mechanic confirmed the mechanical engine noise, and the engine was again shut down. Hand propping revealed that the engine would sometimes "mechanically jam," and further examination revealed the fracture of two crankshaft gear teeth. Both gear teeth exhibited signatures consistent with overload. Corresponding starter adapter gear teeth, that would have meshed with the crankshaft gear teeth during the startup, were cracked on the loaded side. All evaluated metallurgical requirements were met, including core hardness, surface hardness and case depth. Although a single "kick back" while cranking could cause the failure of components of the cranking system, there was no evidence as to why a kick back may have occurred. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2006_NYC06IA226.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.