NTSB CAROL · Event
Event NYC95IA178
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the aileron interconnect became uncoupled, when an abrupt and/or large aileron movement was made in response to a wake turbulence encounter, while on a VOR approach with the autopilot engaged. A factor relating to the incident was: inadequate in-flight planning/decision by the aircrew, which allowed the wake turbulence encounter.
Factual narrative
On July 25, 1995, at 0924 eastern daylight time, an Avro International RJ-70, N833BE, operated by Business Express, Inc., as flight 838, experienced an aileron uncoupling, while on approach to the John F. Kennedy International Airport, Jamaica, New York. The airplane was not damaged, and there were no injuries to the 2 airline transport rated pilots, the 2 flight attendants, or the 20 passengers. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed. The scheduled passenger flight originated in Cleveland, Ohio, at 0755. An instrument flight plan was filed for the flight which was operated under 14 CFR Part 121. Flight 838 was about 4 miles in trail of an Airbus Industries A340, conducting the VOR approach to runway 13L, and in the vicinity of the Carnasie VOR, when the incident occurred. In a written statement, the flying pilot, who occupied the right seat stated: ...During the approach the aircraft rolled rather abruptly to the left (very little fore warning) the auto pilot was engaged in the heading mode. I grabbed the yoke applying adverse control using a fair amount of force.... Radar data from the New York TRACON was examined by the NTSB Vehicle Performance Division. According to their report, "...the incident occurred at approximately 1323:49 [UTC] radar time. The A340 passed through the area of occurrence about 2000 feet MSL, and the RJ-70 passed through the same area at 1,500 feet MSL, and 118 seconds later. The flight data recorder was examined in the NTSB Laboratory in Washington, D.C. According to the data, the airplane rolled left, followed by aileron input for a right roll. The airplane then rolled past the wings level position, to the right, after which the left aileron went into the trail position, and the right aileron continued to respond to inputs from the right side control yoke. The uncoupling of the ailerons preceded the disconnect of the auto-pilot. A check of FAA, and Avro International records revealed no other inflight occurrences of an aileron interconnect uncoupling. Testing of the control yoke uncoupling forces from both pilot seats, in each direction, was within the limits of 30-39 inch-pounds. In both telephone interviews, and written documentation, Avro International reported that the aileron uncoupling was possible when aileron input was applied from the yoke opposite of the side of the auto-pilot servo engaged, and could occur again. No warnings or notices were found in the flight manual for the possibility of an aileron uncoupling, in other than jammed flight controls; however, no jam was found to have occurred. Once uncoupled, the control yokes were connected to the aileron and roll spoiler on their respective side. The airplane was a continuation of the British Aerospace 146 series. Original certification was handled by the Civil Aviation Authority - United Kingdom. The FAA type certificate was issued based upon original certification, and additional FAA requirements, under provisions of a bilateral agreement between the United Kingdom and the United States. The Avro RJ-70 was on approach, about 1500 ft agl, with the auto-pilot engaged, when it encountered wake turbulence from a preceding Airbus 340 and rolled left. The flying pilot, who occupied the right seat, reached for the yoke to disconnect the auto-pilot and to apply corrective aileron input. He applied large and/or abrupt movement of the ailerons before achieving an auto-pilot disconnect. The ailerons uncoupled, after which, the pilot continued with the approach and landed without further incident. A postincident test revealed that the breakaway forces for the aileron interconnect detent strut were within the manufacturer's specification. The manufacturer reported that movement of the aileron flight controls from the side opposite of the engaged auto-pilot servo could result in an aileron uncoupling. Once uncoupled, the left yoke controlled the left aileron and roll spoiler, and the right yoke controlled the right aileron and roll spoiler. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1995_NYC95IA178.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (wake turbulence, turbulence, autopilot). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Aircraft wake turbulence minimization by aerodynamic means
The paper reviews NASA's efforts on wake vortex turbulence minimization by aerodynamic design or retrofit modifications to large transport aircraft.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Wake Turbulence Mitigation for Arrivals (WTMA)
The preliminary Wake Turbulence Mitigation for Arrivals (WTMA) concept of operations is described in this paper. The WTMA concept provides further detail to work initiated by the Wake Vortex Avoidance…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Aircraft wake turbulence avoidance
Aircraft wake turbulence /trailing vortex systems/ avoidance during flight, describing procedures for pilots and tower operators
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Aircraft wake turbulence progress and plans
Aircraft wake turbulence and trailing vortices, investigating physical characteristics, hazard potential and avoidance techniques
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2023 · SKYbrary article
Wake Vortex Turbulence — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary wake vortex turbulence comprehensive article — generation mechanics, dissipation factors, separation standards (ICAO LIGHT/MEDIUM/HEAVY/SUPER + recategorisation RECAT-EU).
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
An Examination of Aviation Accidents Associated with Turbulence, Wind Shear and Thunderstorm
The focal point of the study reported here was the definition and examination of turbulence, wind shear and thunderstorm in relation to aviation accidents.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗