NYC98LA027
1997-11-13 · PITTSTOWN, New Jersey, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport N40
Current FAA registration · N2973Y
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA-28-161
- Year of manufacture
- 1979 · 18 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING 0-320 SERIES (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19790801
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A31253
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's misjudgment of distance and speed during the approach, and her failure to perform a go-around.
Factual narrative
On November 13, 1997, at 1400 eastern standard time, a Piper PA-28-161, N2973Y, was substantially damaged when it departed the runway and struck a fence after landing at the Sky Manor Airport (N40), Pittstown, New Jersey. The certificated private pilot and one passenger were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the personal flight that originated at South Jersey Regional Airport (VAY), exact time unknown. No flight plan had been filed for the flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. In a written statement, the pilot reported the purpose of the flight was to do some sightseeing en route to N40 for lunch. She departed Runway 08 at VAY and expected to land on runway 07 at N40. During the approach to N40 she was "surprised" to see traffic landing on Runway 25 and called on the advisory frequency for the active runway. A pilot that just landed advised that he had used Runway 25 and had encountered a crosswind. The accident pilot then entered the traffic pattern to land on Runway 25. She said: "I was a bit concerned knowing that the runway length was rather short. ...I made final preparations to land, set my third set of flaps, and completely reduced power, knowing that the plane has a strong tendency to float. I believe that I might have had somewhat of a tailwind at the time. As I touched down, I realized that my speed was in excess of what it should have been. However, I was not certain that I would be able to take off again...[I] felt committed to landing the aircraft." The pilot said she was unable to stop on the runway and steered the airplane onto the infield sod. According to a New Jersey Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics Memorandum: "...[The airplane] veered to the right and exited the runway approximately 100 [feet] from the end. The aircraft continued traveling and hit a large rock at the property line that sheared the nose gear. The aircraft slid across the adjoining driveway, struck and went through a wooden fence, at which time the right main gear went through the wing. The aircraft rotated to the right and came to a stop approximately 40 feet inside the fence line." Weather reported at the Allentown Airport, 22 miles west of N40, was: ceiling 7,500 overcast with 10 miles of visibility. The winds were from 120 degrees at 6 knots. The pilot was issued a private pilot certificate three weeks prior to the accident. She reported 104 hours of flight experience, of which 3.7 hours were in make and model. In the Recommendation section of the NTSB Form 6120.1/2 (How Could This Accident Have Been Prevented), the pilot stated she should have received more instruction in this make and model airplane. Additionally, she stated a go-around should have been performed because her "...comfort level was not good." The pilot reported that she used runway 08 at the departure airport, so she expected to land on runway 07 at the destination airport. Approaching the airport she was 'surprised' to see traffic landing on runway 25 and called on the advisory frequency for the active runway. A pilot that just landed advised that he had used runway 25 and had encountered a crosswind. Upon landing, the pilot determined her speed was excessive but that inadequate runway remained to successfully abort the landing. She elected to steer the airplane to the infield sod where it collided with a fence. The pilot was issued a private pilot certificate three weeks prior to the accident. She reported 104 hours of flight experience, of which 3.7 hours were in make and model. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1997_NYC98LA027.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…