NYC98LA058
1997-12-31 · NEW YORK, New York, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport JRA
N355DS has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (BELL OH-58A), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's misjudgment of distance and speed on final approach with a tailwind, and his failure to perform a go-around in a timely manner. A factor in the accident was the strong tailwind.
Factual narrative
On December 31, 1997, at 1625 eastern standard time, an Aerospatiale AS-355 helicopter, N355DS, was substantially damaged during collision with a building while landing at the West 30th Street Heliport (JRA), New York, New York. The certificated commercial pilot and three passengers were not injured. Two other passengers in the helicopter and two persons on the ground received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the sightseeing flight that originated at JRA at 1612. No flight plan was filed for the flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to an FAA Aviation Safety Inspector, the helicopter had completed a sightseeing tour with the pilot and five passengers on board. The helicopter approached the heliport from the northwest with a tailwind and was cleared to land on the "Transient" pad at JRA. The helicopter over flew the Transient pad and collided with the Control Room Building at the heliport. In a written statement, the pilot reported: "When I started to pull collective to terminate the approach, the aircraft started to settle fast. At that point, I was too close to fly out of it so I tried to keep the aircraft level and steered slightly right. The aircraft still settled and then I came over the bulkhead. I tried to pull more collective to stop it. Since I was in ground effect, that was the last thing I could try to stop it. [The] aircraft contacted the ground and skidded until the aircraft contacted the building." In written statements, witnesses stated the helicopter approached the landing site from the northwest. From inside the control room they watched the helicopter "...overshoot the assigned landing spot..." and vacated the room prior to the helicopter's collision with the building. One witness stated, "The pilot did not indicate any control problems with the helicopter." According to the United States Army Field Manual 1-203, Fundamentals of Flight, "Settling with power is a condition of powered flight in which the helicopter settles in its own downwash...Conditions conducive to settling with power are a vertical or near-vertical descent of at least 300 feet per minute and low forward speed...These conditions can occur during downwind approaches...steep approaches...and hover [out of ground effect]....If not enough power is available for recovery, applying collective pitch may aggravate power settling." The pilot reported that there were no mechanical deficiencies with the helicopter. At the time of the accident, the winds reported at JRA were from 290 degrees at 15 knots gusting to 25 knots. The helicopter had completed a sightseeing tour and was returning to its departure point. The helicopter approached the heliport from the northwest with a tailwind and was cleared to land on the 'Transient' pad. The helicopter over flew the Transient pad and collided with the Control Room Building at the heliport. The pilot said the helicopter 'settled fast' as he applied collective pitch to arrest his descent. He said the helicopter was too close to the terminal building to attempt a go-around. The pilot added more collective pitch as he came over the landing surface but was unable to stop the helicopter prior to collision with the terminal building. He reported that there were no mechanical deficiencies with the helicopter. The winds reported at the time of the accident were from 290 degrees at 15 knots gusting to 25 knots. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1997_NYC98LA058.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…