NTSB CAROL · Event
Event NYC98LA069
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's failure to refuel the aircraft resulting in fuel exhaustion, and his unsuccessful attempt to clear the wires. Contributing factors were the pilot's inadequate preflight, dark night conditions, and the wires.
Factual narrative
On February 27, 1998, at 1904 eastern standard time, a Piper PA28R-180, N4679J, was substantially damaged during a forced landing and collision with wires near Walbridge, Ohio. The certificated private pilot received serious injuries and the passenger was fatally injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the personal flight that departed Sandusky, Ohio, destined for the Toledo Suburban Airport, Lambertville, Michigan. No flight plan had been filed for the flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The pilot stated that the purpose of the flight was to fly to Sandusky to pick up a passenger and return to the Toledo Suburban Airport (5G9). During his preflight of the airplane he estimated the fuel level in the tanks. He stated: "...stopped at the right fuel tank and looked inside. I observed the fuel was even with the point where the bottom of the tank meets the outboard vertical wall of the tank...I judged this to represent 13 gallons of fuel based on data I had obtained from my Universal Fuel gauge...The calibration card and Universal Fuel Gauge were in my flight kit which was at my home. I did not have it with me...I checked the left tank, and found the fuel to be level with a point about 2 inches from the outboard vertical wall, along the bottom surface of the tank. I judged this amount to be about 7-8 gallons..." The pilot took off from 5G9 about 1805, and arrived at Sandusky about 1830. Before takeoff, he performed another preflight of the airplane and fuel tanks. He stated: "...The fuel in the right tank was down about 30% compared to earlier. Put another way the gas was level with a point about 3-4 inches from the outboard wall of the tank. The gas in the left tank could only be seen while sloshing around when I wiggled the wing. I judged it to be down about 50% compared to earlier." When the passenger arrived, the pilot departed for the return trip to 5G9. During the climb the pilot informed the passenger, "...to expect the engine to quit at some point as I had decided to run the fuel out of the left tank, and save the right tank for approach and landing. At about 10 minutes into the flight, while going through about 7,000 feet, the left tank ran out as expected." The pilot further stated: "I immediately turned on the fuel pump and switched to the right tank. The engine caught within seconds and I switched off the pump. At that time, I believed I was flying on a tank holding at least 9 gallons of fuel for a flight that only had 20 minutes remaining. But the engine ran for only a few more minutes; quitting as we were climbing through 7,700 feet." In a statement provided to the Ohio State Police, the pilot stated: "...I knew I had more gas in the right tank, so I ran the left tank out of gas. I then switched tanks. It restarted for a while, then quit again. I tried to land at Metcalf, but could not make it. I tried to make a landing in a dirt field...I noticed the wires. When I saw them I dove sharply to avoid them, but I hit them anyway..." According to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Inspector, the airplane struck a lower set of wires between poles, and came to rest about 1/2 mile from the Metcalf Field Airport, Toledo, Ohio. The right wing was separated from the fuselage, but the fuel tank was not damaged. There was no evidence of fuel leaking or spilling from the right tank, and the tank contained about 1/2 quart of fuel. The airplane fuselage was resting on its right side with the left wing vertical to the ground. There was no evidence of fuel spillage or leakage from the left tank, and the tank contained 1/2 quart of fuel also. The last refueling of the airplane occurred on November 17, 1997, with 43.5 gallons. An annual inspection of the airplane was signed off on December 5, 1997, at the same airport where it was refueled. The tach reading at the time of the annual was 1355.67. At the accident scene the airplane's engine tach read 1361.58, about 5.91 hours since the annual inspection. According to the Owner's Handbook, the fuel capacity of the airplane was 50 gallons, of which 48 gallons were useable. The range charts in the handbook listed a fuel consumption rate of 8.1 gallons per hour at 70% power. The engine was examined on April 8, 1998, at the Textron-Lycoming Facility, Williamsport, Pennsylvania, by the Safety Board Investigator. The examination did not reveal any preimpact failures of the engine. When the pilot preflighted the airplane, he observed the fuel in the right tank was even with the point where the bottom of the tank met the outboard vertical wall of the tank, which he estimated was 13 gallons. He observed the fuel in the left tank to be level with a point about 2 inches from the outboard vertical wall, along the bottom surface of the tank, which he estimated was 7-8 gallons. The pilot then flew a 30 minute flight stopping at Sandusky, Ohio, to pick up a passenger. During the second takeoff under dark night conditions, the pilot told the passenger to expect the engine to quit because he planned to run the fuel out of the left tank, and save the right tank for the approach. About 10 minutes after takeoff the engine quit. The pilot switched tanks and the engine restarted for a few minutes, and then quit again while the aircraft was climbing through 7,700 feet. The pilot performed a forced landing noticing wires in his flight path and 'dove sharply to avoid them' without success. The airplane struck a lower set of wires on approach to a field. Examination of the wreckage revealed the left and right fuel tanks were intact and contained about 1/2 quart of fuel each. The airplane's useable fuel capacity was 48 gallons, and according to range charts, the engine's fuel consumption rate was 8.1 gallons per hour at 70% power. The airplane had been flown about 5.91 hours since its last refueling. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_NYC98LA069.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, fuel exhaustion). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
A study of carburetor/induction system icing in general aviation accidents
An assessment of the frequency and severity of carburetor/induction icing in general-aviation accidents was performed. The available literature and accident data from the National Transportation Safet…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗