NYC98LA142
1998-07-10 · WADSWORTH, Ohio, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 3G3
Current FAA registration · N180DR
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 180H
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A14107
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
On July 10, 1998, about 1912 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 180, N180DR, was substantially damaged during a forced landing while on approach to the Wadsworth Municipal Airport (3G3), Wadsworth, Ohio. The certificated private pilot and passenger were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and an instrument flight rules flight plan had been filed for the flight that originated from Augusta (DNL), Georgia, at 1540. The personal flight was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to the pilot, after an uneventful flight from DNL, he entered the traffic pattern at 3G3 for landing on runway 02. While on the downwind leg, about 800 feet above ground level, the airplane's engine suddenly lost power. The pilot said he followed the "engine out" procedures, which included switching the fuel selector position from the right tank to "both;" however, he was unable to restart the engine. The pilot further stated that the airplane was too low to allow for a runway landing and he elected to perform a forced landing to a grass field. The airplane came to rest about 300 feet south of the approach end of the runway. After the accident, during interviews with a Federal Aviation Administration (FFA) Inspector and a Ohio State Highway Patrol Officer, the pilot stated the engine lost power due to fuel exhaustion. He further said, the right fuel tank contained 15 gallons of fuel, but he "forgot to switch tanks." Examination of the wreckage by an FAA Inspector did not disclose any pre-impact malfunctions of the airframe or engine. When the carburetor drain plug was removed, approximately 1 cup of fuel was drained, which included about 1 teaspoon of water. Twenty gallons of fuel, an equal amount from each tank was drained from the airplane about 6 hours after the accident, after maintenance personnel noticed that fuel continued to leak from the gascolater, after the fuel selector had been placed in the "OFF" position. While in the traffic pattern, the airplane's engine lost power. The pilot stated he was unable to restart the engine and because the airplane was too low to allow for a runway landing, he performed a forced landing to a grass field. After the accident, during interviews the pilot stated the engine lost power due to fuel exhaustion. He further said, the right fuel tank contained 15 gallons of fuel, but he 'forgot to switch tanks.' Approximately 20 gallons of fuel (10 gallons per wing tank) were drained from the airplane about 6 hours after the accident. Examination of the wreckage did not disclose any pre-impact malfunctions of the airframe or engine. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_NYC98LA142.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel exhaustion, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.