NTSB CAROL · Event
Event NYC99LA051
Registry · N782QS
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
BOMBARDIER INC BD-100-1A10
Year of manufacture
2015
TCDS
T00005NY · BOMBARDIER INC
Engine
HONEYWELL AS907-2-1A
Seats / Engines
8 seats · 2 engines
Last airworthiness date
20150629
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S AA9963
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The collapse of the airplane's right main landing gear due to inadequate design by its manufacturer.
Factual narrative
On January 22, 1999, about 1520 eastern standard time, a Cessna 650 "Citation VII", N782QS, was substantially damaged when the right main landing gear collapsed during landing at the Port Columbus International Airport (CMH), Columbus, Ohio. The flight was operated by Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. (EJA), and conducted under 14 CFR Part 91, as a training flight. The two certificated airline transport pilots, a company pilot, and a company intern, were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and an instrument flight plan had been filed for the flight which departed the Cincinnati Municipal/Lunken Field Airport. The pilot receiving instruction was performing an instrument approach to runway 28L, a 10,250 foot long, 150 foot wide, asphalt runway. In a written statement, he said: "...At approximately 220 feet, [the instructor pilot] pulled my hood off and told me to land. By this point we were at Vref + 10 or so and held that speed until the flare. I initiated the flare to arrest the sink rate, our lineup was good as I brought the power back. The main gear touched down and I brought the nose down...[the airplane] bounced slightly. At that point we heard a loud pop and the right wing started to dip. We realized that we had lost the right main gear..." The airplane veered off the right side of runway 28L, and then impacted the "C4" taxiway sign located about 7,650 feet from the approach end of the runway. Winds reported at CMH, at 1451, were from 170 degrees at 14 knots, with 19 knot gusts; however, while the airplane was on approach, the CMH Air Traffic Control Tower reported that the winds were from 180 degrees at 10 knots. The pilot reported 3,208 hours of total flight experience, and was type rated in CE-500, and CE-650 airplanes. He had accumulated 1.4 hours of flight experience in the CE-650, prior to the accident flight, which included a landing he performed on January 21, 1999. Additionally, he had accumulated 24 hours of CE-650 simulator experience, which included 29 landings. Examination of the wreckage was performed by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Inspector. The airplane was moved to a hanger and raised. When the right main landing gear was extended by hand, it locked into place. After a new right main gear actuator and right side brace actuator were installed, the landing gear was cycled several times and the main landing gear performed satisfactorily. The nose landing gear had sustained impact damage which precluded its operation. The airplane's right and left main gear actuators and right and left side brace actuators were removed and retained for further examination. The airplane's landing gear hydraulic manifold was also retained. According to the airplane's maintenance manual, "...The main gear locking side brace incorporates a locking mechanism which locks the side brace in the extended position to prevent the main landing gear from collapsing when fully extended. The side brace locking mechanism is unlocked when hydraulic pressure is applied to retract the gear. Maintenance of the left and right locking side brace is identical...." Examination of the landing gear components removed from N782QS was conducted at the Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna), Wichita, Kansas, under the supervision of representatives from the local FAA Aircraft Certification Office. Present during the examinations were representatives from Cessna, EJA, and Teijin Seiki Co., which manufactured the airplane's main landing gear actuators, and side brace actuators. Examination of the components did not reveal any internal failures or malfunctions. A test plan was developed to explore a condition, or conditions that would cause the main landing gear side brace actuator to unlock without applying pressure higher than the normal hydraulic system return pressure to the actuator's retract port. Testing revealed it was possible for the side brace actuator to unlock mechanically by repeated cyclic compressive loading. The compressive load was cycled between near zero, up to values ranging from 1/2 the maximum limit value to near the maximum limit values. During testing, it required a minimum of 50 cycles before the side brace actuator could be induced to unlock. On October 9, 1997, a Cessna 650, of Taiwan registration B-4106, sustained minor damage when it's left landing gear collapsed while landing at Harbin Airport, Harbin, China. The incident was investigated by the Government of China, with assistance from the Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna), Wichita, Kansas. Testing performed on the airplane's landing gear system did not reveal any mechanical malfunctions of the main gear and side brace actuators. As of the date of this report, Cessna was testing "in-house" modified components and a modified hydraulic system to reduce the possibility of an inadvertent unlocking of the side brace actuator. According to a representative of Cessna, Cessna Engineering was waiting for the designer and manufacturer of the side brace actuator, to design, build and provide the modified parts. When made available, the modified parts will be implemented into the tests, and an FAA certification program. After certification, a mandatory service bulletin will be written and FAA approved for incorporation on new production, and "field" airplanes. While landing on runway 28L, the airplane's right main landing gear collapsed. The airplane veered off the right side of the runway and impacted a taxiway sign. Examination of the landing gear system did not reveal any malfunctions or internal component failures. Further testing revealed it was possible for the airplane's side brace actuator to unlock mechanically by repeated cyclic compressive loading. When the compressive load was cycled between near zero, up to values ranging from 1/2 the maximum limit value to near the maximum limit value, the side brace actuator could be induced to unlock in a minimum of 50 cycles. Winds reported at the airport about 30 minutes prior to the accident were from 170 degrees at 14 knots, with 19 knot gusts. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1999_NYC99LA051.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗