NYC99LA094
1999-04-16 · LUMBERTON, New Jersey, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport N14
Current FAA registration · N12469
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 172M
- Engine
- LYCOMING 0-320 SERIES (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19730807
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A065DA
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's misjudgment of altitude and distance which resulted in a runway overrun.
Factual narrative
On April 16, 1999, about 2200 Eastern Daylight Time, a Cessna 172M, N12469, was substantially damaged during a landing at the Flying W Airport (N14), Lumberton, New Jersey. The certificated private pilot and passenger were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight that originated from the Pennridge Airport, Perkasie, Pennsylvania. No flight plan was filed for the cross-country flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The pilot stated that during his first approach to Runway 19, the airplane was too high, and he performed a go-around. During the go-around, he did not notice any fog on the runway. On the second approach, the airplane touched down at approximately 75 knots, bounced, and began to float. The airplane touched down again, in fog. Due to restricted visibility, the pilot decided not to perform an aborted landing. The airplane traveled off the end of the runway and down a ravine. The pilot further stated that he obtained a full weather briefing, and fog was not forecasted at N14. According to a Federal Aviation Administration Inspector, the airplane landed approximately 1,750 feet beyond the approach end of Runway 19, a 3,496 foot long, 75 foot wide, asphalt runway. The airplane overran the runway, and came to rest at the bottom "...of a steep hill." The Inspector further stated that the left wing spar was damaged, but there was no evidence of pre-impact mechanical malfunctions to the airplane, nor did the pilot report any. Weather was not reported at N14. The weather reported at an airport approximately 3 miles away, at 2154, was: wind calm; visibility 1/4 mile; haze; ceiling 400 feet broken; temperature 41 degrees Fahrenheit; dewpoint 30 degrees; altimeter 29.64 inches Hg. The pilot reported a total night flight experience of approximately 4 hours. During the first approach to the runway, the airplane was too high, and the pilot initiated a go-around. On the second approach, the airplane touched down approximately 1,750 feet beyond the approach end of the 3,496 foot long runway, traveling about 75 knots. The airplane bounced, floated, and traveled off the end of the runway. Due to fog, the pilot decided not to perform an aborted landing. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1999_NYC99LA094.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…