NTSB CAROL · Event
Event OPS25LA048
Registry · N185SY
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
EMBRAER ERJ 170-200 LR
Year of manufacture
2016 · 9 years old at event
Engine
GE CF34-8E5
Seats / Engines
88 seats · 2 engines
Last airworthiness date
20161007
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A154E6
Registrant of record
SKYWEST AIRLINES INC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Factual narrative
On July 15, 2025, about 0005 Pacific Daylight Time (PDT), SkyWest Airlines (SKW) flight 3005, an Embraer 170-200LR, N185SY, conducted a pilot-initiated go-around approximately 4 miles from the threshold of runway 10R at Monterey Regional Airport (MRY), Monterey, California due to the runway being closed. The flight departed from San Diego International Airport (SAN), San Diego, California about 2306 PDT. At the time of the go-around, MRY was closed by NOTAM Notice to Airmen between the hours of 0000 and 0500 PDT. Airport operations removed the lighted runway closure marker “X” from both ends of runway 10R and temporarily opened the runway for SKW3005 from 0015 until 0026 PDT. SKW3005 was vectored by the Northern California TRACON Terminal Radar Approach Control Facility. The facility’s 3-letter identifier is NCT however, it is often known as NORCAL, which is what it will be referred to in this report. for another approach to runway 10R. The flight landed uneventfully about 0025. There were no injuries among the 2 flight crewmembers, 2 cabin crewmembers, and 35 passengers who deplaned at the gate. The flight was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121 scheduled domestic passenger flight. History of Flight The flight release for the event flight, titled “final release,” was completed by the SkyWest dispatcher at 2152. The release indicated an estimated time of arrival as 0018. In a statement provided by the dispatcher, they stated that they “reviewed NOTAMs for the airport and noted that the original scheduled times would result in the flight’s arrival before the scheduled closure time. However, the ETD [estimated time of departure] was then delayed by approximately 20 minutes….this pushed the arrival time past the airport closure time.” The dispatcher, after sending the release, passed the flight to their relief, or pass down, dispatcher. The pass down dispatcher stated that the only things that were remarked were “30 minutes of hold for poor weather in the area” and what the alternate was. The pass down dispatcher had no contact with the flight prior to departure. According to ADSB Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast data, flight 3005 pushed back from the gate at SAN about 2250, which was a delay from its scheduled departure time of 2159. The flight taxied to runway 27 and began the departure roll about 2306. According to the captain, while enroute they began reviewing the NOTAMs for MRY. He stated “upon seeing a NOTAM indicating the airport would be closed, I mentioned to the FO that it couldn’t be possible we were arriving into a closed airport, especially given we hadn’t received any communication or advisories from dispatch…” About 2305 the MRY airport operations manager received a voicemail from the airline regarding flight 3005, requesting a delay in the airport’s scheduled closure to accommodate the arrival of flight 3005. However, there was no confirmation returned that the closure would be delayed. About 2341 the flight began to descend into MRY for an approach and landing. The flight contacted NORCAL and stated they were descending from 16,000 ft to 10,000 ft with “the weather and NOTAMs for Monterey.” The NORCAL controller acknowledged their transmission and asked what approach they would like, to which the flight crew responded, “the ILS (instrument landing system) to 10R,” which the controller acknowledged. Figure 1: ILS Runway 10R Approach (Source: Jeppesen) According to airport operations personnel, at 2359 an announcement was made over the common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF) frequency stating that they were beginning the airport closure. About 0001 the flight was cleared by NORCAL for an ILS approach to runway 10R at MRY. Subsequently, the flight crew switched frequency to the CTAF at MRY to announce their intention to land. About 0003, airport operations personnel placed and raised a lighted “X” at each end of runway 10R. About the same time, airport ground personnel heard flight 3005 announce on the CTAF that they were on a 5-mile final. The flight descended via the ILS to approximately 1,300 ft above mean sea level (msl) and then initiated a missed approach maneuver about 0004. Prior to executing the missed approach, the airport operations manager, who was monitoring the CTAF, advised the crew that the airport was closed. According to the FO, the individual on the CTAF stated that they would “pull the X” to allow the flight to land. The flight crew continued the published missed approach procedure, contacted NORCAL, and stated they were flying the published missed approach due to the runway being closed. Audio recording provided by the FAA indicated that when the flight crew contacted NORCAL on the missed approach and explained the reason for the missed approach, the air traffic controller stated, “… news to me.” The NORCAL controller subsequently stated, “This is a big surprise to what you are saying, and we are trying to figure out on our side what is going on.” The flight crew confirmed they had adequate fuel to attempt another approach and, if necessary, be able to divert to the flight’s filed alternate airport. NORCAL vectored the flight to an approximate 20 mile final. According to the captain “NORCAL advised that they would not clear us for the approach unless we received positive verbal confirmation that the runway was open.” As the flight approached the final approach fix, the MRY ground crew personnel reported that the “runway was open.” The crew informed the NORCAL controller, who vectored the flight to intercept the approach to MRY. During the second approach, the flight’s dispatcher sent an ACARS Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System message asking the crew for their intentions. The captain asked the FO to respond with “Landing MRY. Standby.” The flight subsequently landed on runway 10R about 0025, exited the runway at taxiway “L,” and taxied to the gate uneventfully. Figure 2: SkyWest Flight 3005 Approach to MRY (Source: ADSBexchange.com) A review of the NOTAMs for MRY revealed that there were ten NOTAMs in effect at the time of the incident. One of the NOTAMs specified that the MRY airport was closed Tuesday through Saturday from July 8, 2025, until August 9, 2025, from 0000-0500 PDT. The incident flight occurred on Tuesday. Airport Information MRY was located about 3 miles to the southeast of Monterey, California at an elevation of 256.6 ft msl. The airport has two paved landing surfaces, 10R/28L and 10L/28R. Runway 10R/28L was 7,175 ft long and 150 ft wide. Runway 10L/28R was “not available for air carrier use. Source: https://aeronav.faa.gov/afd/12jun2025/sw_216_12JUN2025.pdf ” The MRY air traffic control tower (ATCT) operated daily from 0700 until 2200. At the time of the incident, the ATCT was closed and was not providing services.
NOT FOR NAVIGATION
Figure 3: MRY Airport Diagram (Source: Jeppesen) Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2025_OPS25LA048.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗