SEA01FA106
2001-05-28 · Augusta, Montana, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 3U7
Current FAA registration · N2564M
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA-12
- Year of manufacture
- 1946 · 55 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING 0-290 SERIES (140 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 3 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19551108
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A270B8
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to maintain adequate airspeed after takeoff resulting in an inadvertent stall at low a altitude.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On May 28, 2001, about 1251 mountain daylight time, a Piper PA-12, N2564M, was destroyed after colliding with terrain shortly after takeoff from Benchmark Airport (3U7), which is located approximately 20 nautical miles west of Augusta, Montana. The private pilot, who was the sole occupant of the airplane, was fatally injured. The airplane was owned by the pilot and was being operated as a visual flight rules (VFR) personal/pleasure flight under Title 14, CFR Part 91, when the accident occurred. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the cross-country flight. A pilot rated witness to the accident reported that the accident airplane departed runway 30. Shortly after departure, the pilot made a climbing left turn over the camping area. The Witness reported that during the climbing turn (at an estimated altitude of approximately 200 feet above ground level [AGL]), the airplane "…appeared slow and then stalled." The airplane impacted terrain in a nose low attitude approximately 340 feet east of the departure end of runway 30. Post crash fire and impact forces destroyed the airplane. The pilot was participating in a fly-in/work session organized by the Montana Pilot's Association. Participants in the fly-in spent the weekend doing maintenance on the airport and its facilities. The pilot of the accident airplane arrived at Benchmark two days prior to the accident. At the conclusion of the fly-in activities, the pilot departed Benchmark with a planned destination of Helena, Montana.
PERSONNEL INFORMATION
The pilot held a private pilot certificate with airplane single-engine land, multi-engine land and instrument airplane ratings. His most recent third class medical certificate was issued on September 15, 2000. The medical certificate carried limitations requiring the pilot to possess glasses for vision correction. On the medical application, the pilot indicated that he had accumulated 2,600 hours total time, of which 75 hours had been accrued in the six months preceding the medical application.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
The airplane, a 1946 Piper PA-12, was powered by a Lycoming O-320 series engine rated at 150 HP. Maintenance records indicate that the airplane had accumulated a total time in service of approximately 3,574 hours. The records also indicated that an annual inspection of the airframe, engine and propeller was completed on May 1, 2000.
METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION
The 1256 Aviation Routine Weather Observation at Great Falls, Montana, located approximately 60 miles east of the accident location, reported winds from 170 degrees at 14 knots; visibility 10 statute miles; scattered towering cumulus clouds at 10,000 feet above ground level (AGL); broken clouds at 20,000 feet AGL; temperature 27 degrees C; dew point 7 degrees C; and altimeter setting 29.70 inches Hg.
WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION
Personnel from the National Transportation Safety Board, US Forest Service and parties to the investigation accessed the airplane wreckage on May 29, 2001. The wreckage was located on forested Federal land at 47 degrees, 28 minutes north latitude, 112 degrees, 51 minutes west longitude, adjacent to a forest service access road approximately 340 feet northeast of the Benchmark airport. The approximate elevation of the wreckage site was 5,470 feet above mean sea level (MSL). All aircraft components were located in the immediate area of the main wreckage and burn area. The airplane impacted terrain in a nose-low attitude at the base of a hill. The still-attached propeller assembly was partially buried immediately forward of the engine and fuselage remains. Extensive impact and thermal damage was noted to the frontal area of the engine and engine cowling. Fire and impact forces destroyed the airplane's instrument panel, cockpit controls, cabin area and the still attached empennage and tail control surfaces. The tail structure, approximately mid-span, was bent forward and lateral twisting was noted. All fixed and moveable empennage control surfaces were found attached to their respective hinge points. Control continuity was established from the empennage control surfaces forward to the remains of the cockpit. The right wing, which was partially attached to the airframe, sustained extensive thermal and impact damage. The right aileron was intact and control continuity was established from the aileron bell crank to the cockpit. The left wing was located with the main wreckage and sustained extensive thermal and impact damage. A majority of the fabric was burned away, and the primary wing structure was fragmented. The aileron bell crank and portions of the aileron were attached to the wing, and control continuity was established from the damage to the wing to the cockpit. Extensive thermal and impact damage was noted to the engine and associated engine components. Both crankcase halves, pistons, cylinders and overhead components were intact and showed no evidence of catastrophic type failure. Piston, valve train and accessory gear continuity was established by rotating the engine's crankshaft by hand. Portions of the exhaust and intake tubing were crushed and distorted. Internal examination of the piston cylinders, utilizing a lighted bore scope revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunction. Both magnetos and their respective ignition harnesses sustained extensive thermal damage and could not be functionally tested. Spark plugs were removed and normal operating wear patterns were noted. The carburetor was found attached to its mounting flange. The throttle and mixture control linkages were attached to their respective control arms. The carburetor floats were intact and showed no signs of hydraulic type crushing. The carburetor's finger inlet screen was intact and free of contaminates. The propeller assembly was found as a unit attached to the crankshaft flange. Rearward crushing and thermal damage was noted to the propeller spinner. Leading edge gouging, "S" bending and chord wise scratches were noted to propeller blade A. Aft bending, leading edge gouging, and chord wise scratches were noted to propeller blade B. Postaccident inspection of the engine and propeller assembly revealed no evidence of a pre-impact mechanical malfunction or failure.
MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Postmortem examination of the pilot was conducted by St. Peter's Hospital, Helena, Montana. According to the County Coroner, the pilot's cause of death was traumatic internal injuries. The manner of death was reported as accidental. Toxicology samples were shipped to the Federal Aviation Administration Civil Aeromedical Institute (CAMI), Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for analysis. According to the postmortem toxicology report, results were negative for carbon monoxide, cyanide, ethanol and controlled substances.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
On June 18, 2001, the airframe, engine and associated components were released to the pilot's estate in Helena, Montana. Witnesses reported that following takeoff from the paved runway, the pilot initiated a left climbing turn. Witnesses reported that during the climbing turn (at an estimated altitude of approximately 200 feet above ground level [AGL]), the airplane "…appeared slow and then stalled." The airplane impacted terrain in a nose low attitude approximately 340 feet east of the departure end of runway 30. Post crash fire and impact forces destroyed the airplane. Investigators did not find any evidence of pre-impact aircraft or engine malfunctions during postaccident examination of the wreckage. The pilot was participating in a fly-in/work session organized by the Montana Pilot's Association. Participants in the fly-in spent the weekend doing maintenance on the airport and its facilities. The pilot of the accident airplane arrived at Benchmark two days before the accident. At the conclusion of the fly-in activities, the pilot departed Benchmark with a planned destination of Helena, Montana. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2001_SEA01FA106.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.