SEA03LA157
2003-07-28 · Hood River, Oregon, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to refuel prior to the flight, resulting in fuel exhaustion during the initial climb, followed by the pilot's failure to maintain airspeed. An inadvertent stall was a factor.
Factual narrative
On July 28, 2003, at 1015 Pacific daylight time, an experimental Schleicher ASW-24E, N24YB, motorized glider, registered to and operated by the pilot as a 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight, collided with the terrain shortly after takeoff from the Hood River Airport, Hood River, Oregon. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed. The glider was substantially damaged and the private pilot, the sole occupant, was fatally injured. The previous owner reported that the pilot just purchased this glider and it was delivered to him on July 27. The owner stated that he gave the pilot a briefing on the glider and all related equipment. A cockpit checkout was also accomplished by a local flight instructor. The first flight was discussed between the previous owner, the pilot, and the flight instructor for that day. The pilot took off and climbed to approximately 5,000 feet. The pilot stowed the engine and flew around for a while. The previous owner was in radio contact with the pilot and stated that he accomplished three engine redeployments and air restarts before returning to the airport for landing. The previous owner estimated the engine run time to have been 15 minutes for the initial climb, then five minutes for each of the three engine deployments. The previous owner reported that before the first flight he estimated the fuel on board to have been approximately 2.1 gallons or approximately 40 minutes of engine run time. The owner also reported that after the accident, he noted that the same amount of fuel was still present in the spare fuel can from the day before the accident. No fuel was added after the first flight. The glider was equipped with a Cambridge flight recorder. The recorder was downloaded by personnel from Cambridge Aero Instruments, Inc., Horn Lake, Missouri. The flight accomplished on July 27, 2003, indicated that the flight duration was one hour and ten minutes. Engine run time was 18 minutes and 40 seconds. On July 28, the pilot took off for the second flight in this glider at 0938 for a 26 minute flight before returning to the airport. The data indicated that the engine run time was nine minutes and 20 seconds. The accident flight was the pilot's third flight in this glider. Witnesses reported that the glider attained an altitude of approximately 300 feet above ground level when the engine lost power. The glider made a turn when it appeared to stall and then descended into a pear orchard. A Federal Aviation Administration Inspector from the Portland, Oregon, Flight Standards District Office, Hillsboro, Oregon, responded to the accident site. The inspector reported that the glider's fuel tanks were breached. Fuel lines running to the engine were void of fuel. Control continuity was established to the engine controls. The propeller remained attached to the engine and the crankshaft rotated. Further inspection of the engine did not reveal evidence of a mechanical failure or malfunction. At the time of the accident, the pilot held a private pilot certificate for glider operations. The pilot obtained a third class medical certificate on March 7, 1989. No waivers or limitations were indicated, and the pilot did not list any flight time at the time of the visit. An autopsy was performed on the pilot by Karen Gunson, M.D., Oregon State Medical Examiner. The pilot's cause of death was due to chest injuries with exsanguination. Toxicological samples were sent to the Federal Aviation Administration Civil Aeromedical Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for analysis. The results of the analysis were negative. The pilot had just purchased the powered glider the day before the accident and accomplished one successful flight. Shortly after takeoff for the third flight on the second day, witnesses reported that the glider attained an altitude of approximately 300 feet agl when the engine lost power. The glider made a turn when it appeared to stall and then descended into an orchard. Post accident inspection of the engine revealed no fuel was present in the fuel lines to the engine and no evidence of a mechanical failure or malfuntion was found. The wing fuel tanks had been breached during the impact sequence. The previous owner reported that the glider had about 2.1 gallons of fuel, or about 40 minutes of engine run time at the beginning of the first flight. The owner also reported that after the accident, he noted that the same amount of fuel was still present in the spare fuel can used for fueling from the day before the accident. No fuel was added after the first flight on the first day. The installed Cambridge flight recorder indicated the engine run time for the two previous flights to be 28 minutes. The third flight was not recorded. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2003_SEA03LA157.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel exhaustion). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…