SEA05LA153
2005-07-28 · Sunriver, Oregon, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport S21
Current FAA registration · N110MP
- Make / Model
- MOONEY M20J
- Year of manufacture
- 1979 · 26 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING I0360 SER A&C (200 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19790827
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A02D54
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The loss of engine power as a result of both sets of magneto points failing to open due to excessive wear of the nylon cam followers. The excessive wear of the cam followers was due to maintenance personnel's failure to follow the magneto manufacturer's recommended maintenance procedures and inspect the cam follower felt pads for adequate lubrication at 100-hour intervals. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain available for the forced landing.
Factual narrative
On July 28, 2005, approximately 1215 Pacific daylight time, a Mooney M20J airplane, N110MP, sustained substantial damage during a forced landing following a loss of engine power in the traffic pattern at Sunriver Airport, Sunriver, Oregon. The commercial pilot and his two passengers were not injured. The airplane was registered to and operated by the pilot. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the personal cross country flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The airplane departed from Sacramento, California, at 1000 with an intended destination of Sunriver. According to the pilot, while on the downwind leg for landing on runway 18, the engine "backfired, ran rough and quit." During the ensuing forced landing, the airplane collided with trees and terrain short of the runway. The outboard section of the left wing sustained structural damage. During an attempted engine run following the accident, conducted at the request of the owner's insurance company, the engine could not be started, and it was determined that both sets of magneto points were not opening. The single-drive dual magneto, an Electrosystems-rebuilt TCM/Bendix D4LN-3000, P/N 10-682555-11, S/N 4082075, was removed from the engine and shipped to the NTSB investigator-in-charge (IIC) for further examination. The magneto was examined under the supervision of the IIC at Galvin Flying Service in Seattle, Washington, on October 24, 2005. The mechanic who performed the inspection found that the nylon cam followers on both sets of points were worn to the point that they could no longer open the contacts. The mechanic noted that the cam followers appeared to be burned and discolored due to a lack of lubrication. The felt pads mounted on the cam followers appeared to be very dry. According to the mechanic, these pads are normally saturated with oil to lubricate the cam followers. The TCM Ignition Service Support Manual for the D-3000 magneto, Recommended Maintenance and Overhaul Periods section, dated July 1989, states, in part: "After the first 50 hour and 100 hour periods in service and every 100 hours thereafter, the contact assemblies should be checked as specified in paragraph 6.2.1 of Periodic Maintenance." The Periodic Maintenance section, Paragraph 6.2.1 Contact Assemblies, dated July 1989, states, in part: "Check condition of cam follower felt. Squeeze felt between thumb and forefinger. If fingers are not moistened with oil, re-oil using 2 or 3 drops of 10-86527 Lubricant." According to the airplane's maintenance records, the magneto was delivered with a Textron Lycoming factory rebuilt engine that was installed in the airplane on October 1, 1994, at a tachometer reading of 0.0 hours. New points were installed in the magneto on January 1, 2001, at a tachometer reading of 737.4 hours. The most recent engine 100-hour inspection was performed on May 3, 2005, at a tachometer reading of 1,086.1 hours. The engine had accumulated 24.2 hours since the most recent inspection when the accident occurred. A review of the engine logbook found no entries found indicating the points had been inspected since their installation. According to the pilot, while on the downwind leg for landing on runway 18, the engine "backfired, ran rough and quit." During the ensuing forced landing, the airplane collided with trees and terrain short of the runway. The left outer wing sustained structural damage. During an attempted engine run following the accident, the engine could not be started, and it was determined that both sets of magneto points were not opening. Inspection of the single-drive dual magneto found that the nylon cam followers on both sets of points were worn to the point that they could no longer open the contacts. The cam followers appeared to be burned and discolored due to a lack of lubrication. The felt pads mounted on the cam followers that are normally saturated with lubricating oil were found to be very dry. The magneto manufacturer's recommended maintenance instructions call for the cam follower felt pads to be inspected for the presence of adequate lubricating oil every 100 hours time in service. According to the airplane's maintenance records the points had accumulated 372.9 hours since installation on January 1, 2001. There were no entries found in the engine logbook indicating the points had been inspected since their installation. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2005_SEA05LA153.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.