SEA06LA074
2006-04-14 · Belgrade, Montana, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport KBZN
N671 has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (LANCAIR LANCAIR IV P, built 2012), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The total loss of drive power to the aircraft's propeller while on a visual final approach, due to the decoupling of the quill shaft between the reduction gearbox and the engine power section. Factors include a dark night, no suitable terrain on which to land, and the rough/uneven nature of the terrain upon which the pilot had to execute his forced landing.
Factual narrative
On April 14, 2006, approximately 2040 mountain daylight time, an experimental Central Copters Lancair IV-P, N671, impacted the terrain during an off-field forced landing about one and one-half miles northwest of the approach end of runway 12 at Gallatin Field, Belgrade, Montana. The commercial pilot and his two passengers were not injured, but the aircraft, which was owned and operated by the pilot, was destroyed by the post-crash fire. The 14 CFR Part 91 personal pleasure flight, which departed Spokane International Airport, Spokane, Washington, about 90 minutes prior to the accident, had been on an IFR flight plan, and was on a night visual approach in visual meteorological conditions at the time of the power loss that lead to the forced landing. There was no report of an ELT activation. According to the pilot, who failed to meet the reporting requirements of Title 49, Part 830.15 (a), when the aircraft was about three miles from the approach end of the runway, the engine suddenly developed a loud howling sound, the torque became very erratic, and the exhaust gas temperature (EGT) exceeded its normal limits. Soon thereafter the engine lost all power, and though there was no suitable nearby terrain on which to land, the pilot turned toward what appeared to be an open area in order to execute a forced landing. Although the touchdown was successful, the aircraft structure came in contact with the rough terrain during the landing roll, and after it came to a stop, a small fire developed near the engine exhaust. Although all occupants exited the aircraft without injury, they were unable to extinguish the fire, which slowly spread, and ultimately consumed the aircraft structure. During the investigation, it was determined that the experimental aircraft was powered by a Garrett TPE331-6-252M turbo-shaft engine, driving a 280 centimeter diameter five-bladed variable pitch wood/composite MT Propeller (MTV-27). Engine traceability records indicate that the engine was last overhauled by AlliedSignal Aerospace Services, Repair Station ZN3R030M, on 6/19/97. Records also show that Intercontinental Jet Corporation mounted the engine on a test stand in January of 2001, to comply with the operational checks in accordance with the maintenance manual. While on the test stand, all oil was drained from the engine in preparation for shipment to the owner of N671. On October 10, 2005, the owner/builder of N671 annotated in the engine log book that he had installed the engine on Lancair serial number 423 (N671). Discussions with International Jet Corporation determined that they no longer had process records on file for this engine, and the engine records provided by the owner/builder of N671 did not indicate that any of the monthly or biennial engine preservation/depreservation actions prescribed in Chapter 72 of the TPE331-6/10 Maintenance Manual had been performed. On May 17, 2006, an owner-directed engine teardown inspection was performed by Ag Air Turbines of Caldwell, Idaho. In addition to the owner and his representatives, both the FAA and Honeywell (Product Integrity) had individuals present to observe the teardown. During this teardown, it was determined that the majority of the structure of the quill shaft forward splines, which showed significant thermal distress, had worn away, resulting in the power section of the engine becoming uncoupled from the reduction gearbox section of the engine. It was also noted that the ball lock coupler and its three locking balls, which ensure the coupling of the quill shaft to the high-speed pinion gear shaft, were found lying in the oil in the bottom of the nose case. The root cause of the disengagement of the coupling assembly was not positively determined. While on final for a night visual approach, the quill shaft between the reduction gear box and the power section of the engine decoupled. This resulted in a loss of drive input to the propeller, and ultimately to an off-field forced landing on rough/uneven terrain. Although the initial touchdown was successful, during the rollout the aircraft impacted the terrain, and after it came to a stop a small fire developed near the engine exhaust. Although the occupants tried to put out the fire, they were unable to do so, and the aircraft was eventually consumed by the fire. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2006_SEA06LA074.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.