SEA06LA114
2006-06-05 · Ennis, Montana, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport KEKS
Current FAA registration · N24BF
- Make / Model
- BEECH A36
- Year of manufacture
- 1980 · 26 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR IO 520 SERIES (285 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19800728
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A22DC5
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The loss of engine power during takeoff due to an excessively lean fuel-to-air mixture ratio as a result of excessive mating surface wear between the mixture control arm and metering shaft. A factor was the improper installation of the new engine, which resulted in excessive wear and metering of fuel and loss of engine power. An additional factor was the rough, uneven terrain.
Factual narrative
On June 5, 2006, about 1900 mountain daylight time, a Beech A36 Bonanza, N24BF, sustained substantial damage following a loss of engine power and subsequent forced landing approximately two miles south of the Ennis - Big Sky Airport (KEKS), Ennis, Montana. The airplane, which was owned by the pilot, was being operated as a visual flight rules (VFR) cross-country flight under the provisions of Title 14, CFR Part 91, when the accident occurred. The certificated private pilot, and three passengers, were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the cross-country flight that originated from Ennis just before the accident. The pilot's planned destination was Hamilton, Montana. The pilot reported that shortly after takeoff, the airplane lost engine power and he elected to land in an open field south of the airport. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the firewall during the landing. On June 27, 2006, representatives from the Federal Aviation Administration (Helena, Montana, Flight Standards District Office) and Teledyne Continental Motors examined the airplane at a hangar facility in Belgrade, Montana. Functional testing of the mixture control linkage revealed that the metering shaft rotated to the mechanical stop when actuated to the "idle cut-off" position; however, when the mixture control was actuated to the "full-rich" position, the metering shaft rotated approximately 40 percent of potential (full) travel and did not reach the mechanical stop. Further examination revealed the mixture control arm retaining nut was tight, however extensive wear to the serrated mating surfaces of the mixture control arm and metering shaft was observed. The serrated edges had worn smooth and fretting type damage was noted to both surfaces. Maintenance records showed that on March 9, 2006, the airplane's engine, a Continental IO-520, was removed and the airframe was retrofitted with a factory-rebuilt IO-550-B in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA2200SW. The mixture control arm was shipped with the factory-rebuilt engine. The certified airframe and power plant (A&P) mechanic, who performed the maintenance on the airplane, stated the mixture control arm was installed in conjunction with the engine conversion. The airplane had accumulated approximately 35 hours since the conversion. The pilot reported that shortly after takeoff the airplane lost engine power and he elected to land in an open field south of the airport. Post accident evaluation and testing of the mixture control linkage revealed that the metering shaft rotated to the mechanical stop when actuated to the "idle cut-off" position; however, when the mixture control was actuated to the "full-rich" position, the metering shaft rotated approximately 40 percent of potential (full) travel and did not reach the mechanical stop. Further examination revealed the mixture control arm retaining nut was tight, however extensive wear to the serrated mating surfaces of the mixture control arm and metering shaft was observed. The serrated edges had worn smooth and fretting type damage was noted to both surfaces. Maintenance records showed that the airplane's original engine, a Continental IO-520, was removed and the airframe was retrofitted with a factory rebuilt (zero time) IO-550-B in accordance with a Supplemental Type Certificate (STC). The certified airframe and power plant (A&P) mechanic, who performed the maintenance on the airplane, stated the mixture control arm (which was shipped with the engine) was installed in conjunction with the engine conversion. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2006_SEA06LA114.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.