NTSB CAROL · Event
Event SEA96LA117
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's inadequate fuel management, which resulted in fuel starvation. The aircraft's lack of a fuel quantity gauge and trees in the forced landing area were related factors.
Factual narrative
On June 8, 1996, at approximately 1745 Pacific daylight time, a Head Pitts S-1C, N7BH, was substantially damaged when it landed and struck trees approximately 2,000 feet short of runway 34L at Paine Field, Everett, Washington, following a loss of engine power. The aircraft was being operated under 14 CFR 91 on a local personal flight from Paine Field. The private pilot of the amateur-built, single-seat, experimental-category airplane received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident and no flight plan was filed. The pilot reported that he took off from Paine Field at about 1715 with 22 to 24 gallons of fuel on board. Records of Fliteline Services Inc. of Paine Field, which sells aviation fuel at the airport, indicate the aircraft was serviced with 6.3 gallons of fuel between about 1500 and 1600 on the day of the accident. An individual from Fliteline Services reported to the FAA: "This fuel went into the rear tank. The [forward] tank was full, I was told, as was the rear tank." The pilot went on to state in his accident report: "Fuel tanks topped by Fliteline Services truck prior to departure....Approx[imately] 1730 [time] pilot sensed very slight transitory/[intermittent] vibration. Engine running 2450/2500 RPM with no RPM drop or power loss....At this RPM, in level flight, experience has shown 5.5-6.5 gph fuel burn. [The aircraft is] not equipped with fuel [gauges]....Engine lost power on base. Unable to reach runway threshold on final; [the aircraft] landed short of [runway 34L]...." The airplane struck one or more trees during the forced landing. A witness to the accident reported that although the aircraft "went end over end" after ground contact, there was no smell of fuel at the accident site. Photos taken by FAA inspectors at the accident site showed one propeller blade bent back about 30 degrees at mid-span and the other bent back about 10 degrees at approximately 3/4 span. Neither propeller blade exhibited any chordwise scratching, leading edge gouging, or torsional twisting. A post-accident examination by FAA investigators did not reveal any mechanical deficiencies in the Lycoming O-360-A1A engine, which had a pressure carburetor installed. The FAA investigators reported that in a dip check of main tank fuel levels, which they performed with the airplane in a tail-low attitude, the main tank forward compartment (capacity approximately 10 gallons) was observed to contain fuel in approximately the bottom 2 1/2 inches of the tank, and no fuel was observed in the main tank rear compartment (capacity also about 10 gallons; not interconnected with the forward tank compartment.) The local fire department reported to the FAA inspectors that they had switched the fuel selector valve from "MR" to "OFF" at the accident site. The fuel selector valve has five positions consisting of "OFF", "MF" (main forward), "MR" (main rear), "C" (common), and "I" (inverted). An individual who stated that he owns an aircraft whose hangar adjoins the accident aircraft's hangar at Paine Field reported in a telephone interview with the NTSB investigator-in-charge (IIC) on June 19, 1996, that on two separate occasions, about 2 to 2 1/2 months prior to the accident, he heard the accident pilot instructing fuel truck drivers "not [to put] too much fuel" into his airplane. This individual stated that the accident pilot watched the fuel transfer closely during those refuelings. Numerous documentation discrepancies on the part of the pilot were noted during the accident investigation as follows. The pilot did not provide any information on his accident report regarding his most recent biennial flight review (the last update to the pilot's certificates in the FAA airman registry was in 1984.) Also, although he submitted a copy of a third-class FAA medical certificate dated June 20, 1996 (12 days after the accident,) FAA records indicated that the pilot's most recent medical certificate as of the accident date was a third-class medical certificate issued on May 22, 1992. The pilot did not indicate the date of the aircraft's last inspection on his accident report; and, although he indicated that the aircraft was on a "continuous airworthiness" maintenance program and had last received a "continuous airworthiness" type of inspection, the most recent entries on copies of aircraft and engine logbooks submitted by the pilot had been made in 1982. The pilot claimed that he was a co-owner of the aircraft to FAA inspectors, but was not listed as a registered owner in the FAA aircraft registry. FAA inspectors also reported that the pilot was unable to furnish current pilot, medical, airworthiness, or registration certificates to them. During an approach to land, the engine lost power on base leg. Subsequently, the pilot landed short of the airport runway, and the aircraft struck trees. The pilot reported that he took off with 22 to 24 gallons of fuel and flew for 30 minutes before the accident at an estimated 5.5 to 6.5 gallon per hour burn rate; a fuel slip indicated the aircraft received 6.3 gallons of fuel before the flight. FAA investigators found 2 to 2 1/2 inches of fuel in the bottom of the main tank forward compartment and no fuel in the main tank rear compartment. Also, they found no mechanical problems with the engine. Fire department personnel switched the aircraft's fuel selector valve from 'MR' (main rear) to 'OFF' at the accident scene. The experimental aircraft was not equipped with fuel gauges. No evidence of a current biennial flight review, aircraft condition inspection, or medical certificate was found. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1996_SEA96LA117.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel starvation, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗