Skip to content

Atlas / NTSB / SEA99LA072

NTSB CAROL · Event

Event SEA99LA072

1999-05-21 AURORA, Oregon, United States Airport · UAO None 1 aircraft Status: Completed

Aircraft involved

Probable cause & findings

Aircraft control was not maintained. The pilot's misjudged flare and inadequate remedial action, along with the flight instructors delayed remedial action were factors.

Factual narrative

On May 21, 1999, at 0900 Pacific daylight time, the pilot of a Cessna R172K, N1909V, registered to and operated by the pilot as a 14 CFR Part 91 instructional flight, failed to maintain control of the aircraft during the landing and the left wing contacted the runway surface at the Aurora State Airport, Aurora, Oregon. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed for the local flight. The airplane was substantially damaged and the private pilot and flight instructor were not injured. The flight originated from Aurora about one hour and 15 minutes prior to the accident. During a telephone interview and subsequent written statement, the pilot stated that he was receiving instruction for the instrument rating. The pilot reported that the first touch-and-go with about 30 degrees of flap extension was made without incident. During the second approach, the pilot was instructed to use full flap extension. The pilot reported that the approach for landing was normal. The pilot felt that the flare might have been "a little high" (approximately 10 feet above the pavement, and the stall horn sounded about five feet above the runway), and as the main landing gear touched down "firmly," the pilot initiated a go-around. The pilot stated that "I introduced full power as we were touching down, the nose remained high and we veered to the left side of the runway." The flight instructor took over the controls at this time to continue the go-around, not realizing that when the wing dipped down during the veering maneuver, it contacted the runway surface. While on the downwind leg, the pilot noticed that the wing tip fairing was vibrating. The flight instructor continued in the pattern and landed the airplane without further incident. After the airplane was taxied into the hangar, the pilot noted the damage to the outboard section of the wing and to the left side horizontal stabilizer. The pilot reported that the approach for the full flap landing was normal. The pilot stated that the flare was a little high, about ten feet above the runway, and the stall horn sounded about five feet above the runway. The pilot stated that as the main landing gear touched down 'firmly' with the airplane in a nose high attitude, he added full power. The airplane veered to the left side of the runway, and the flight instructor took over the controls to continue the go-around, not realizing that when the wing dipped down during the veering maneuver, it contacted the runway surface. During the downwind leg, the pilot noticed that the wing tip fairing was vibrating. The flight instructor continued in the pattern and landed without further incident. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12

Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file NTSB_1999_SEA99LA072.txt. Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb. Full investigation docket on data.ntsb.gov ↗.

Related research

What the literature says.

Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.

Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗