WPR10LA411
2010-08-18 · Leavenworth, Washington, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 27W
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to adequately evaluate the airport and its environment in relation to the aircraft’s performance, which resulted in the airplane's failure to attain sufficient altitude to clear trees during the initial climb.
Factual narrative
On August 18, 2010, about 1015 Pacific daylight time, an Ercoupe 415C, N2368H, collided with trees during takeoff from Lake Wenatchee State Airport, Leavenworth, Washington. The pilot/owner was operating the airplane under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91. The private pilot and one passenger sustained serious injuries. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the wings and fuselage from impact forces. The cross-country personal flight was en route to Auburn, Washington. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed. The pilot reported that he made a short field takeoff to the west with an approximate 5-mile-per-hour (mph) headwind. Shortly after liftoff, he realized that the airplane would have difficulty clearing trees at the end of the runway, and considered aborting the takeoff. However, he decided that not enough runway length remained to do so, and continued the takeoff and climb at what he believed was the best angle of climb speed. The airplane did not stall, but the pilot stated that the speed might have gotten below the best angle of climb speed. He turned the airplane slightly to the right, but the airplane collided with the top 10 feet of trees surrounding the airport. The pilot stated that he lost consciousness, and his legs were numb when he awoke. The passenger was able to evacuate herself from the airplane, and called for emergency service. The pilot stated that, in retrospect, he might have taken off downwind to the east where there was more room, used a different airport, or maintained a faster airspeed. The pilot also reported no mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airplane at the time of the accident. A witness, who held a pilot certificate, but had not flown for 30 years, stated that he drove the pilot and passenger to the airplane. He observed the pilot taxi the airplane to the end of the runway, and perform a run up. The engine sounded fine and smooth. The airplane taxied into position on runway 27, and the airplane appeared to stay stationary as the pilot added power. The airplane then started forward. The witness noted that while the airplane taxied to the runway, there was no wind. During the takeoff, he noted a very slight crosswind. The turf field appeared to be bumpy, and the airplane kicked up dirt as it progressed down the runway. The takeoff roll was longer than he expected. After liftoff, the airplane did not appear to be climbing, and drifted to the right while remaining in a wings level attitude. There were no sudden movements, and it started a shallow climb. He lost sight of the airplane behind trees, and heard a loud sound about 2 seconds later. He did not have the impression that the airplane had engine issues, or stalled after getting airborne. When the witness arrived at the wreckage, the passenger was standing beside the airplane. He instructed the pilot to turn off the ignition switch. The pilot reported that he made a short-field takeoff with an approximate 5 mile-per-hour headwind. Shortly after liftoff, he realized that, even with the best angle of climb speed, the airplane would have difficulty clearing trees at the end of the runway. The pilot continued the climbout and turned the airplane slightly to the right and the airplane collided with the top 10 feet of trees surrounding the airport. The pilot stated that, in retrospect, he might have taken off downwind to the east where there was more room, used a different airport, or maintained a faster airspeed. A witness noted that the turf field appeared to be bumpy and the takeoff roll was longer than he expected. He did not have the impression that the airplane had engine issues or entered into a stall after becoming airborne. The pilot also reported no mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airplane at the time of the accident. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot
- — Environmental issues-Physical environment-Object/animal/substance-Tree(s)-Effect on equipment
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Altitude-Not attained/maintained
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_WPR10LA411.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…