WPR10LA445
2010-09-02 · Rancho Murieta, California, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport RIU
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s improper flare and recovery from a bounced landing.
Factual narrative
On September 2, 2010, about 0945 Pacific daylight time, an amateur built Morehead KR-2 experimental airplane, N522PC, was substantially damaged following a bounced landing and loss of control at the Rancho Murieta Airport (RIU), Rancho Murieta, California. The first pilot, who occupied the left seat, was seriously injured, and the second pilot, who occupied the right seat sustained minor injuries. The airplane was registered to and operated by the first pilot under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the local personal flight. The flight departed RIU about 0940. In a statement submitted to the National Transportation Safety Board investigator-in-charge (IIC), the first pilot reported that on the day prior to the accident he flew the airplane from the right seat doing touch-and-go landings while the second pilot occupied the left seat. The first pilot revealed that on the day of the accident he again flew from the right seat, did nine landings, and again the second pilot occupied the left seat; after a short break they switched seats. On the first landing attempt from the left seat, the first pilot reported that he was a little fast and high on final, which resulted in a go-around, and that the next approach was “much better,” but he bounced the landing “pitching my nose high.” The first pilot added that he [added] full power to go around, but when he lowered the nose to build up speed he overcorrected and hit the runway with the nose wheel, which caused the nose gear to collapse and the propeller to strike the runway. The pilot added that the airplane skidded down the runway before going off the left side and nosing over. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) aviation safety inspector reported that the airplane had sustained substantial damage to the firewall and the rudder. No preimpact anomalies were reported that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane. The pilot reported that during the landing the airplane bounced and the nose pitched up, so he added power to go around. This was followed by his lowering the nose to build up airspeed; however, he overcorrected and the airplane impacted the runway with the nosewheel, collapsing the nose strut. The airplane subsequently skidded down the runway before exiting off the left side and nosing over, which resulted in substantial damage to the firewall and rudder. The pilot said that there were no preimpact anomalies that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Landing flare-Not attained/maintained - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Pitch control-Incorrect use/operation - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_WPR10LA445.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (loss of control, go-around). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Scoping Review of Aviation Loss of Control Inflight Research
Loss of control – inflight (LOC-I) contributes to aircraft accidents at unacceptably high rates. Significant industry efforts and research have aimed to improve LOC-I prevention, detection, and recove…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2024 · SKYbrary article Loss of Control In-Flight (LOC-I) — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary comprehensive knowledge-base entry on Loss of Control In-Flight — definitions, contributing factors, accident case studies (Air France 447, Colgan 3407), and prevention strategies.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (International Conference on Networking and Services) Risk Assessment of Loss of Control In-Flight Trajectories for Urban Air Mobility Safety
In Urban Air Mobility (UAM), maintaining a minimum separation between aircraft is a safety requirement, which becomes challenging amidst congested air traffic and off-nominal conditions, such as Loss …
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper Utilizing Deep Learning to Predict Unstabilized Approaches for General Aviation Aircraft
Unstabilized approaches pose a major hazard for general aviation aircraft. In the period from 2009 to 2019, 3,257 general aviation accidents occurred during the landing phase of flight in which loss o…