NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR14CA351
Registry · N10033
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CESSNA 172S
Engine
LYCOMING IO-360-L2A (180 hp)
Seats / Engines
4 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20050303
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A00791
Registrant of record
THUNDERFIGHTER LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The student pilot's inadequate flare and loss of aircraft control during landing, which resulted in multiple bounces.
Factual narrative
The student pilot was conducting his final required solo cross-country flight. The flight to the first destination was uneventful, and the pilot entered the left-hand traffic pattern for the runway at the non-towered airport. The pilot reported that his base-to-final turn was slightly "wide," which placed the airplane to the right of the extended runway centerline. He also reported that he was "a little high" on the final approach. He corrected his flight path, and was satisfied that the airplane was positioned for a normal landing. The pilot used full flaps for this landing, as was his normal habit pattern. The airplane landed slightly beyond where the pilot had planned, but not far enough down the runway to cause him any concern. The touchdown was "hard," the airplane bounced, and the pilot "re-flared" to correct the situation. The airplane began "porpoising" and bounced at least two more times before the pilot was able to regain control and keep it on the ground. During the bounces, the pilot did not adjust the power or consider aborting the landing attempt. Although he had learned about porpoising in his ground training, he had never experienced it prior to this event, and did not immediately recall or implement the flight school's recommended corrective action, which was a go-around. The pilot taxied the airplane to a parking spot, and discovered that the airplane was substantially damaged. The firewall, cockpit floor, and several fuselage skins were buckled, and elevator travel was restricted. The pilot reported no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. The student pilot was conducting his final required solo cross-country flight. The flight to the first destination was uneventful, and the pilot entered the left-hand traffic pattern for the runway at the non-towered airport. The pilot reported that his base-to-final turn was slightly "wide," which placed the airplane to the right of the extended runway centerline. He also reported that he was "a little high" on the final approach. He corrected his flight path, and was satisfied that the airplane was positioned for a normal landing. The pilot used full flaps for this landing, as was his normal habit pattern. The airplane landed slightly beyond where the pilot had planned, but not far enough down the runway to cause him any concern. The touchdown was "hard," the airplane bounced, and the pilot "re-flared" to correct the situation. The airplane began "porpoising" and bounced at least two more times before the pilot was able to regain control and keep it on the ground. During the bounces, the pilot did not adjust the power or consider aborting the landing attempt. Although he had learned about porpoising in his ground training, he had never experienced it prior to this event, and did not immediately recall or implement the flight school's recommended corrective action, which was a go-around. The pilot taxied the airplane to a parking spot, and discovered that the airplane was substantially damaged. The firewall, cockpit floor, and several fuselage skins were buckled, and elevator travel was restricted. The pilot reported no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Landing flare-Not attained/maintained - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Student/instructed pilot - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2014_WPR14CA351.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗