NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR14TA248
Registry · N4692A
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
EA VISION EA J100
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A5BDA9
Registrant of record
AGRI SPRAY DRONES LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The collapse of the nosewheel landing gear due to the disengagement of the nosewheel landing gear pin. Contributing to the accident was the failure of the main hydraulic system due to overpressurization for reasons that could not be determined during postaccident examination of the airplane.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn June 15, 2014, about 2044 Pacific daylight time, a Lockheed SP-2H, N4692A, was substantially damaged when the nose wheel landing gear collapsed during landing roll at the Fresno Yosemite International Airport (FAT), Fresno, California. The airplane was registered to Minden Air Corporation, Minden, Nevada, and operated as Tanker 48 by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forestry Service, under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 137. The airline transport pilot (ATP) rated captain and the ATP rated first officer were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and a company flight plan was filed for the local firefighting flight. The flight originated from Porterville Municipal Airport (PTV), Porterville, California, at 1934. The captain reported that following an uneventful aerial drop, the flight was returning to PTV. During the descent check, he noticed that the hydraulic pressure indicated 0 and that the first officer subsequently verified that the sight gauge for the main hydraulic fluid reservoir was empty. The first officer opened the jet engine doors successfully as the captain selected gear down with no response. The captain notified base personnel at PTV of the situation, and informed them that they would be orbiting to the east of the airport to troubleshoot. The captain and first officer performed the emergency checklist, and verified that the nose wheel landing gear was extended. The captain stated that the first officer then installed the pin in the nose wheel landing gear as part of the emergency checklist. The flight diverted to FAT due to a longer runway and emergency resources as both pilots briefed the no-flap landing procedure, airspeeds, and approach profile. As the flight continued toward FAT, the flight crew informed Fresno Approach Control of the hydraulic system failure, and continued to perform the emergency gear extension checklist. The first officer extended the main landing gear using the emergency gear release, which resulted in three down and locked landing gear indications in the cockpit. As the flight neared FAT, the first officer added 2 gallons of hydraulic fluid to the main hydraulic reservoir while the captain attempted to extend the flaps unsuccessfully. Subsequently, the flight landed normally on runway 26R. During the landing roll, the nose wheel landing gear collapsed, and the airplane came to rest nose low. The first officer reported that following completion of the emergency nose gear extension checklist, he physically inserted the nose gear pin in place prior to the landing at FAT. Examination of the airplane by representatives from the Forest Service revealed that the forward portion of the fuselage was structurally damaged. The airplane was recovered to a secure location for further examination. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONThe accident airplane was manufactured in 1959 as an SP-2H Neptune. On April 18, 2002 it was issued a Special Airworthiness Certificate in the Restricted Category, for Forest and Wildlife Conservation. At the time of the accident, the airframe total time was 10,431.9 hours, of which 2,617.7 hours were as an air tanker. The airplane's main hydraulic system is 3,000 psi system powered by two engine driven hydraulic pumps. A 1,500 psi emergency hydraulic power system for extending the nose landing gear, and operating the brakes and varicam is provided by an electrical hydraulic pump. As part of the retardant tank modification, an additional electric auxiliary pump was installed, which was capable of pressurizing the main hydraulic system to 3,000 psi. The landing gear emergency extension checklist states the following items should be performed: 1. Normal landing gear circuit breaker pull 2. Airspeed below 155 KTS 3. Gear handle down 4. Emergency nose gear switch down 5. Nose gear pin install 6. Emergency nose gear switch off 7. MLG emergency release pulled The nose gear pin is a steel pin, which has a retaining bearing at the end of the pin. The top of the pin is pressed, which allows for the bearing to become disengaged, and allows removal of the pin. In addition, the button portion of the pin has a ring with a red flag attached. AIRPORT INFORMATIONThe accident airplane was manufactured in 1959 as an SP-2H Neptune. On April 18, 2002 it was issued a Special Airworthiness Certificate in the Restricted Category, for Forest and Wildlife Conservation. At the time of the accident, the airframe total time was 10,431.9 hours, of which 2,617.7 hours were as an air tanker. The airplane's main hydraulic system is 3,000 psi system powered by two engine driven hydraulic pumps. A 1,500 psi emergency hydraulic power system for extending the nose landing gear, and operating the brakes and varicam is provided by an electrical hydraulic pump. As part of the retardant tank modification, an additional electric auxiliary pump was installed, which was capable of pressurizing the main hydraulic system to 3,000 psi. The landing gear emergency extension checklist states the following items should be performed: 1. Normal landing gear circuit breaker pull 2. Airspeed below 155 KTS 3. Gear handle down 4. Emergency nose gear switch down 5. Nose gear pin install 6. Emergency nose gear switch off 7. MLG emergency release pulled The nose gear pin is a steel pin, which has a retaining bearing at the end of the pin. The top of the pin is pressed, which allows for the bearing to become disengaged, and allows removal of the pin. In addition, the button portion of the pin has a ring with a red flag attached. TESTS AND RESEARCHExamination of the airplane by US Forest Service personnel revealed evidence of hydraulic fluid leakage from the right engine cowling drain. Examination of the right engine accessory pad revealed that two of the eight bolts attaching the hydraulic pump were separated. Hydraulic fluid was observed puddled in the lower cowling, and residual fluid was found on components in the vicinity to the hydraulic pump. The system was pressurized with the auxiliary pump, and no apparent leaking lines or fittings were noted. The engine was motored utilizing the starter, and fluid was observed dripping off the bottom of the hydraulic pump. The nose gear pin was not located during the postaccident examination of the airplane. It could not be determined how or when the nose gear pin became disengaged from the nose gear jury strut. According to US Forest Service personnel, the installation of the nose gear pin is a critical step to be completed for a landing with a main hydraulic system failure. If not performed, the nose landing gear will collapse on touchdown. The installation of the pin requires a pilot to climb down into the nose landing gear wheel well that is located below the cockpit flight deck. While space is limited and it is difficult to maneuver within this area, the pin is installed while the nose landing gear door is already open and the gear is extended. The hydraulic pump was a Stratopower Variable Delivery pump manufactured by The New York Air Brake Company, part number 66YD300, serial number DO-39. It was overhauled by Thunder Airmotive, Inc., on May 3, 2010, and installed on the accident airplane February 20, 2013. The hydraulic pump accumulated a total of 362.5 hours since overhaul at the time of the accident. The most recent inspection performed in the accessory area of the right engine was a 50 hour inspection, completed on May 23, 2014, about 30.8 hours prior to the accident. Examination of the hydraulic pump was conducted at the facilities of Mark Air Motive, Moses Lake, Washington, under the supervision of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator-in-charge (IIC) on December 18, 2014. Examination of the pump revealed that the outer portion of the case was cracked. The hydraulic pump drive shaft rotated by hand. The pump was disassembled, and all internal components were intact and unremarkable. The backup ring was found partially extruded from the pump housing, which the technician stated was consistent with an over pressurization event of the hydraulic system. The captain reported that, while returning to the departure airport following an uneventful aerial drop, he noticed that the hydraulic pressure gauge indicated 0. The first officer subsequently verified that the sight gauge for the main hydraulic fluid reservoir was empty. The flight crew began performing the emergency gear extension checklist and verified that the nosewheel landing gear was extended. The captain stated that the first officer then installed the pin in the nosewheel landing gear as part of the emergency checklist. As the flight crewmembers diverted to a nearby airport because it had a longer runway and emergency resources, they briefed the no-flap landing. The first officer extended the main landing gear using the emergency gear release, which resulted in three down-and-locked landing gear indications. Subsequently, the airplane landed normally; however, during the landing roll, the nosewheel landing gear collapsed, and the airplane then came to rest nose low. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the nosewheel landing gear pin was disengaged from the nosewheel jury strut, and the pin was not located. The disengagement of the pin allowed the nosewheel landing gear to collapse on landing. It could not be determined when or how the pin became disengaged from the jury strut. Installation of the pin would have required the first officer to maneuver in a small area and install the pin while the nose landing gear door was open and the gear extended. Further, the pin had a red flag attached to it. When inserted during flight, the flag encounters a high amount of airflow that causes it to vibrate; this could have resulted in the pin becoming disengaged after it was installed. Evidence of a hydraulic fluid leak was observed around the right engine cowling drain. The right engine hydraulic pump case was found cracked, and the backup ring was partially extruded, which is consistent with hydraulic system overpressurization. The reason for the overpressurization of the hydraulic system could not be determined during postaccident examination. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Nose/tail landing gear-Not specified - C
- F Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Hydraulic power system-Hydraulic, main system-Failure - F
- F Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - F
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2014_WPR14TA248.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗