WPR15IA035
2014-10-23 · Mesa, Arizona, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport IWA
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure of the left main landing gear to extend, which resulted in a gear-up landing. The reason for the left main landing gear’s failure to operate normally could not be determined because postincident examination of the landing gear system did not reveal any anomalies that would have precluded normal operation.
Factual narrative
On October 23, 2014, about 1215 mountain standard time, a North American P-51D airplane, N351BD, sustained minor damage following a gear up landing at the Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport (IWA), Mesa, Arizona. The commercial pilot, who was also the owner of the airplane and the sole occupant, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local flight, which was being operated in accordance with 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91, and a flight plan was not filed. The flight departed Stellar Airpark (P19), Chandler, Arizona, about 1117. In a statement provided to the National Transportation Safety Board investigator-in-charge, the pilot reported that after taking off and retracting the landing gear, he noticed a burning smell, either rubber or electrical, and the gear lights did not indicate a normal retraction. The pilot stated that he extended the landing gear and did a flyby of an accompanying helicopter that was filming him, and was informed that the right main landing gear was extended, and that the left gear was not. The pilot opined that he then flew into open airspace and began troubleshooting the gear malfunction, and performed the emergency procedures numerous times, but with no success; he then instructed the helicopter pilot to inform the IWA air traffic control tower operator that he would be doing a gear up landing here. The pilot reported that after he had burned off most of his fuel, the IWA controller cleared him to land on Runway 30R. The pilot stated that he performed a normal full stall, gear up landing, after which the airplane slid to a stop on the right center of the runway; only minor damage to the belly scoop was observed. The airplane was subsequently recovered from the runway to a secure location for further examination. On April 1, 2015, under the supervision of a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) aviation safety inspector, a certified FAA airframe and powerplant mechanic who specializes in older warbird type airplanes performed an examination of the landing gear in an attempt to determine what precluded it from operating normally. The mechanic initially reported that after disassembly of the left main landing gear oleo strut, the only thing he could determine was that the chevron seals might have grabbed the strut, not allowing the oleo to extend on lift off. The mechanic further reported that he also checked the run out on the inner strut to see if it was bent, which it was not. He also opined that the strut gland nut might have been too tight, which could have compressed the seals against the inner strut, which could have caused the strut to extend too slowly, not giving it enough time to extend before the landing gear was retracted, which then may have caused the left main landing gear to get caught on the wheel well structure. However, after the mechanic performed further disassembly, inspection, and reassembly of the landing gear, he reported in an additional statement to the NTSB IIC, that he was unable to provide a definite cause that would explain why the landing gear became caught on the wheel well. The reason for the landing gear failing to operate in its normal extension and retraction modes could not be determined during the investigation. The pilot reported that, after taking off and retracting the landing gear, he noticed that the landing gear lights did not indicate a normal landing gear retraction. The pilot extended the landing gear and then flew by a nearby helicopter, and the helicopter pilot informed him that the right main landing gear was extended but that the left main landing gear was not extended. The pilot's attempts to troubleshoot the problem were unsuccessful, so he chose to return to the airport. After burning off fuel, the pilot made an uneventful gear-up landing. The reason for the left main landing gear's failure to operate normally could not be determined during postincident examination. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Main landing gear-Inoperative - C
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2014_WPR15IA035.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…