WPR15LA001
2014-10-03 · Council, Idaho, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport U82
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to maintain control while maneuvering for landing following a loss of oil pressure. Contributing to the accident was foreign material contamination of the oil system due to improper maintenance.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn October 3, 2014, about 1330 mountain daylight time (MDT), an experimental Thomas D Gaston, Thunder Mustang, N51TG, crashed during approach to landing at the Council Municipal Airport, Council, Idaho. The owner/pilot was operating the airplane under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91. The airline transport pilot was the sole occupant, and sustained fatal injuries; the airplane was destroyed by impact forces. The local personal flight departed Council at an undetermined time. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed. Witnesses reported that during a flight after the pilot had performed maintenance on the engine, the pilot radioed that he was having an engine oil pressure issue, and was returning to the airport. One witness observed the airplane flying a normal pattern until he turned base closer to the airport than normal. He then observed the airplane as it turned on to final making descending "S" turns, he then saw the airplane make a very hard right turn towards the North-Northeast about 100 feet above the ground. He watched the airplane as it flew away from the airport when he lost sight of it. PERSONNEL INFORMATIONA review of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airman records revealed that the 75-year old pilot held an airline transport pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single-engine land, multiengine land, and instrument airplane. The pilot also held a repairman experimental aircraft builder certificate. The pilot held a third-class medical certificate issued on June 30, 2014. It had the limitations that the pilot must wear corrective lenses for distant vision, and possess glasses for near vision. No personal flight records were located for the pilot. The investigator in charge obtained the aeronautical experience listed in this report from a review of the FAA airmen medical records on file in the Airman and Medical Records Center located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The pilot reported on his medical application that he had a total time of 18,500 hours with 25 hours logged in the last 6 months. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONThe airplane was an experimental amateur built Thomas D Gaston, Thunder Mustang, serial number EITM027. A review of the airplane's logbooks revealed that the airplane had a total airframe time of 222.8 hours at the last conditional inspection dated July 1, 2013. The last entry in the aircraft logbook was dated October 2, 2014, the day before the accident. The entry was for a conditional inspection, and was signed by the pilot/builder but no aircraft times were recorded in the entry. The engine was a Falconer V-12, serial number 12027. Total time on the engine at the last inspection was unrecorded, and could not be determined; time since major overhaul was 0.0 hours. The engine logbook had an entry dated October 2, 2014, stating the engine was test run, and safe for flight. The engine was equipped with two MoTec M48 Engine Control Units (ECU). The units were recovered and sent to the NTSB recorders lab for download. AIRPORT INFORMATIONThe airplane was an experimental amateur built Thomas D Gaston, Thunder Mustang, serial number EITM027. A review of the airplane's logbooks revealed that the airplane had a total airframe time of 222.8 hours at the last conditional inspection dated July 1, 2013. The last entry in the aircraft logbook was dated October 2, 2014, the day before the accident. The entry was for a conditional inspection, and was signed by the pilot/builder but no aircraft times were recorded in the entry. The engine was a Falconer V-12, serial number 12027. Total time on the engine at the last inspection was unrecorded, and could not be determined; time since major overhaul was 0.0 hours. The engine logbook had an entry dated October 2, 2014, stating the engine was test run, and safe for flight. The engine was equipped with two MoTec M48 Engine Control Units (ECU). The units were recovered and sent to the NTSB recorders lab for download. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONInvestigators from the FAA examined the wreckage at the accident scene. The accident site was in a rocky field, about 1/3 of a mile northwest of the approach end of runway 17. The first identified point of contact (FIPC) was a ground scar. The airplane impacted the ground at a shallow angle, and the fuselage broke apart as it slid approximately 60 feet along a heading of 318° true. The engine broke loose from the airframe and slid another 15 feet. The gear reduction case and propeller hub continued another 25 feet with one blade intact and largely undamaged. There was no rotational damage noted to the propeller. COMMUNICATIONSThe accident pilot was overheard on the airport UNICOM frequency by witnesses at the airport. The pilot reported he was returning due to low oil pressure. No other communication from the pilot was heard. MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATIONAn autopsy was completed at the request of the Adams County Coroner on October 4, 2014. The coroner ruled the manner and cause of death to be a result of blunt force trauma due to an aircraft accident. No significant natural disease was identified by autopsy. The FAA's Bioaeronautical Research Sciences Laboratory, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, performed toxicological testing of specimens of the pilot. Analysis of the specimens contained no findings for carbon monoxide, and volatiles. They did not perform tests for cyanide. The report contained the following findings for tested drugs: 0.034 (ug/ml) diphenhydramine detected in blood cavity.. TESTS AND RESEARCHThe airplane engine was equipped with two engine control units (ECU) which were recovered and sent to the NTSB recorders lab for download. The NTSB lab specialist submitted a factual report which is attached to the docket for this accident. A summary of the findings of the ECU's revealed that the engine lost oil pressure 110 seconds prior to the accident. The recorded engine RPM increased and decreased in correlation with the recorded throttle position throughout the flight. The engine RPM at impact was 2,000 RPM. All the other recording parameters appeared normal until time of impact. Examination of the recovered engine was conducted on October 7, 2015, at the facilities of Air Transport Inc. in Phoenix Arizona. A report of the examination is attached to the accident docket. No evidence of preimpact mechanical malfunction was noted during the examination of the recovered engine. The lower oil pan was removed and the bottom end of the engine was visually examined with no signs of thermal damage or oil starvation identified. A foreign substance was found in the oil pan and throughout the oil cavity consistent with shredded blue paper shop towels which had been mixed in with the oil. Review of the aircraft records revealed limited entries as to the detail of work being done on the airframe or engine. Additional information regarding the work done on the airplane or engine by the pilot/mechanic was obtained by conversations with witnesses without any supporting documents from the aircraft records. The pilot/builder had not flown his experimental amateur-built airplane for several months while he performed a top overhaul of the engine. During the first flight after completion of the overhaul, a witness observed the pilot start the airplane, complete an engine run-up, and take off uneventfully. Shortly thereafter, the pilot radioed that he was having an engine oil pressure issue and was returning to the airport. The witness then observed the airplane on the downwind leg of the traffic pattern. The airplane turned onto the base leg about "1/2 mile closer than normal," and, upon turning onto the final leg of the traffic pattern, began a series of descending S-turns. The airplane then made a "hard" right turn away from the runway and impacted rocky terrain. The airplane was destroyed, and the pilot was fatally injured. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed foreign material in the oil consistent with the remnants of blue paper shop towels. This contamination was likely the cause of a low oil pressure indication. Recorded data indicated that the engine experienced a loss of oil pressure about two minutes before the accident. All other recorded parameters revealed no anomalies, with the engine indicating about 2,000 rpm at the time of impact, which may suggest that the pilot was trying to limit internal damage to the engine by reducing its power setting. Given the witness account of the airplane turning onto the base leg closer than normal, it is possible that the observed s-turns on the final leg of the approach, as well as the turn away from the runway, were an attempt to lose altitude and speed so that the airplane could be landed on the runway. It is likely that the pilot's preoccupation with the low oil pressure indication contributed to a loss of control while maneuvering for landing. Toxicological testing of the pilot was positive for diphenhydramine; however, there was no evidence to suggest that this may have contributed to the accident. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Repair-Maintenance personnel - C
- C Aircraft-Fluids/misc hardware-Fluids-Oil-Fluid condition - C
- F Environmental issues-Physical environment-Terrain-Rough terrain-Contributed to outcome - F
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2014_WPR15LA001.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (loss of control, maintenance). All research papers
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2002 · Accident report Loss of Control and Impact with Pacific Ocean — Alaska 261
Alaska Airlines Flight 261 (MD-83) Pacific Ocean, January 31, 2000 — 88 fatalities. Definitive investigation of the Alaska 261 pitch-runaway-and-loss-of-control crash.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Scoping Review of Aviation Loss of Control Inflight Research
Loss of control – inflight (LOC-I) contributes to aircraft accidents at unacceptably high rates. Significant industry efforts and research have aimed to improve LOC-I prevention, detection, and recove…
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.