WPR15LA191
2015-06-19 · Polson, Montana, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 8S1
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A total loss of engine power during approach for reasons that could not be determined because postaccident examination revealed no anomalies that would have precluded normal operation.
Factual narrative
On June 19, 2015 about 1340 mountain daylight time, a Cessna 180A, N9699B, was substantially damaged during a forced landing near Polson, Montana. The commercial pilot and two passengers were not injured. The airplane was registered to and operated by the pilot under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the cross-country flight, and no flight plan was filed. The flight originated from Cavanaugh Bay Airport (66S), Coolin, Idaho at 1140 with a planned destination of Polson Airport (8S1), Polson, Montana.In a written statement, the pilot stated that during approach, about 3 miles from the airport, the engine lost all power. The pilot continued his descent while maintaining the best glide airspeed. He performed the engine restart procedures where he applied carburetor heat. Despite his efforts the engine would not restart and he initiated a forced landing to a small field. During the landing, the right main gear collapsed, subsequently resulting in substantial damage to the right wing and fuselage. The pilot further stated that he had 26 gallons of fuel on board prior to departing 66S. An onsite examination of the wreckage was conducted by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector on June 19, 2015. The inspector was present during the transportation process of the wreckage. Seven gallons of fuel was collected from each main tank with some fuel remaining in each. The main fuel line to the carburetor was disconnected and fuel was present. A postaccident examination of the wreckage was conducted on July 6, 2015. The carburetor drain plug was removed and fuel flowed freely from the drain. The gascolator was filled with fuel and free of contaminates. The gascolator was inspected with a flashlight and its screen was free of debris and contaminates. The crankshaft was rotated by hand and engine gear continuity was attained from the propeller assembly to the accessory case. Confirmed compression from all six cylinders and spark from both magnetos were attained. Additionally, on July 20, 2015, the wing tank vent lines and left and right fuel tank caps were examined and revealed no anomalies. The postaccident examination revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunction or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The Glacier Park International Airport, Kalispell (GPI), Montana, located 37 nautical miles north of the accident site, at 1255 the automated weather observation, included winds from 230 degrees at 16 knots, gusting to 23 knots, visibility 10 miles, clear skies, temperature 25 degrees C, dew point 3 degrees C, and an altimeter setting of 29.89 inches of mercury. The GPI 1355 automated weather observation, included winds from 240 degrees at 17 knots, gusting to 22 knots, visibility 10 miles, clear skies, temperature 26 degrees C, dew point 3 degrees C, and an altimeter setting of 29.87 inches of mercury. In the remarks section of the observation, peak winds were recorded from 220 degrees at 27 knots. Temperature and dew point values for the approximate time of the accident indicated that the relative humidity was approximately 24 percent. When the intersection of the two temperature values was located on a chart that depicted carburetor ice envelopes, the point was in the region of the chart denoted as "Icing at Glide and Cruise Power." The pilot reported that, while the airplane was on approach and about 3 miles from the airport, the engine lost all power. The pilot continued the descent while maintaining the best glide airspeed and performing the engine restart procedures, which included applying carburetor heat. Despite the pilot's efforts, the engine would not restart, and he initiated a forced landing to a small field. During the landing, the landing gear collapsed, and the right wing impacted terrain. Postaccident examination of the engine and airframe revealed no mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. About the time of the accident, a weather reporting facility located 37 nautical miles north of the accident site recorded a temperature and dew point that were conducive to the accumulation of carburetor icing at glide power. However, it could not be determined whether carburetor ice caused the power loss. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
- — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Temp/humidity/pressure-Conducive to carburetor icing-Contributed to outcome
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2015_WPR15LA191.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…