WPR16LA033
2015-11-25 · Wickenburg, Arizona, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport E25
N7PM has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (BOEING A75L300, built 1943), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A partial loss of engine power due to a separation of the mixture control cable clamp, which was either not installed or secured correctly during maintenance.
Factual narrative
On November 25, 2015, about 1000 mountain standard time, a Piper PA-28-140, N7PM, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Wickenburg, Arizona. The private pilot and flight instructor were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight. The instructor stated that the purpose of the flight was to familiarize the pilot with the airplane before he purchased it. After completing maneuvers, they returned to the airport to conduct practice takeoffs and landings. While on the base leg of the traffic pattern for landing on runway 5, the pilot applied engine power to arrest the airplane's rate of descent; however, there was no response from the engine. The instructor verified that the carburetor heat was on and the mixture was in the full-rich position, and noted that the fuel selector was on the left tank, which contained full fuel. The instructor stated that he was able to produce a response from the engine by "pumping" the throttle; however, it was not adequate to sustain flight, and the pilot performed a forced landing to desert terrain. The airplane came to rest upright and sustained substantial damage to both wings, the fuselage, and empennage. About 20 gallons of blue-colored fuel was drained from the right wing fuel tank. The left wing fuel tank was breached during the accident sequence. The airplane was recovered to a secure storage facility for examination. Visual examination of the engine revealed no anomalies. A test run of the engine was attempted, but the engine could not be started. Further examination revealed that the mixture control cable clamp was missing, which allowed the cable to flex and resulted in no movement of the mixture control arm. A makeshift clamp was fashioned and a second engine run attempted. The engine started, accelerated smoothly, and ran without hesitation through various power settings. Review of the airplane's maintenance logbook revealed that the engine was removed, disassembled, and inspected following a propeller strike in November 2014. The most recent annual inspection was completed the month before the accident, and the logbook entry for that inspection indicated that the engine had accumulated less than one hour of operation since its reinstallation. At the time of the accident, the engine had accumulated .66 hours tachometer time since the annual inspection. The flight instructor and private pilot were approaching the airport for landing. According to the flight instructor, when the pilot applied engine power to arrest the airplane's descent, the engine did not respond. Because the airplane was not within gliding distance of the runway, the pilots performed an emergency landing on desert terrain, sustaining substantial damage to both wings, the fuselage, and empennage. Examination of the engine revealed that the carburetor mixture control cable clamp, which should have been located between the firewall and the carburetor mixture control arm, was missing. Without the clamp, the mixture control cable could flex, which resulted in no corresponding movement of the arm when the mixture control lever was adjusted in the cockpit. A test of the engine with a makeshift clamp revealed no anomalies. It is likely that, because the airplane had flown about 1 hour before the accident, the mixture control cable clamp separated during the flight, and the mixture control arm became stuck in a reduced-fuel position, resulting in a partial loss of engine power. The engine had been reinstalled on the airplane about 1 hour tachometer time before the accident. It is likely that the clamp was improperly installed or secured at that time. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine fuel and control-Fuel control/carburetor-Not serviced/maintained
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine fuel and control-Fuel distribution-Not serviced/maintained
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Installation-Maintenance personnel
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2015_WPR16LA033.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.