WPR16LA135
2016-07-04 · St. Maries, Idaho, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport S72
Current FAA registration · N916BN
- Make / Model
- VAN'S AIRCRAFT RV-6
- Year of manufacture
- 1998 · 18 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING O&VO-360 SER (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 2 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19980531
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S ACAD1B
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A partial loss of engine power due to carburetor icing, which resulted from the pilot’s failure to apply carburetor heat.
Factual narrative
On July 4, 2016, about 0930 Pacific daylight time, a Bert N. Norris RV-6, experimental amateur-built conventional gear airplane, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a loss of engine power near St. Maries Municipal Airport (S72), St. Maries, Idaho. The airplane was registered to a private individual and operated by the pilot as a 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The private pilot and one passenger were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions (VMC) prevailed and a flight plan was not filed. The flight originated from Homeport Airport (11WA), Cheney, Washington, about 0910.During a telephone interview with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator-in-charge (IIC) on the day following the accident, the pilot stated that while on short final approach to runway 28 at S72, the engine experienced a partial loss of power. He believed the power loss was due to carburetor icing, as he may not have activated the carburetor heat. He then switched fuel tanks, activated the boost pump, pumped the throttle, but was unable to restore power. The pilot reported that he subsequently landed the airplane in a field about 100 yards from the approach end of runway 28. during the landing roll, the airplane nosed over, which resulted in substantial damage to the rudder. In a written report submitted to the NTSB IIC on July 14, 2016, the pilot reported that as he approached S72 he visually confirmed that the weather was still VMC. He entered the [traffic] pattern for runway 28, began to reduce power on the engine, and while in the turn from base leg to final approach the engine completely quit. The pilot stated that he verified that the carburetor heat and the fuel boost pump were on, after which he changed the fuel selector to the opposite tank. He then looked for a place to land, but most of the fields were filled with hay bales, which prompted him to continue his turn to the airport. The pilot stated that the airplane touched down about 500 ft short of runway 28 and nosed over. The airplane sustained damage to both wings, the rudder and the elevator. According to a Federal Aviation Administration aviation safety inspector who performed an onsite postaccident examination of the airplane, the inspector reported that he was able to rotate the propeller by hand, that the engine appeared to be in good shape, and the examination revealed no general indication of engine failure that would have been causal to the accident. Additionally, the inspector reported that the pilot relayed to him that carburetor heat might not have been applied during the flight, which may have caused the engine to lose power during the approach to the airport. According to a carburetor icing probability chart, the reported temperature and dew point at the time of the accident were in a range for moderate carburetor icing at cruise power settings and serious carburetor icing at descent power settings. The private pilot reported that, on short final to the runway, the engine lost partial power. The pilot then switched fuel tanks, activated the boost pump, and pumped the throttle, but engine power was not restored. The pilot subsequently landed in a field about 300 to 500 ft short of the runway, and the airplane nosed over. Postaccident examination of the airplane and engine revealed no mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. The pilot stated that he believed that the loss of power was due to carburetor ice because he might not have applied carburetor heat during the flight. The weather conditions at the time of the accident were conducive to moderate carburetor icing at cruise power settings and serious carburetor icing at descent power settings. It is likely that the loss of engine power resulted from carburetor icing due to the pilot's failure to apply carburetor heat. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Ice/rain protection system-Intake anti-ice, deice-Not used/operated - C
- C Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Temp/humidity/pressure-Conducive to carburetor icing-Effect on equipment - C
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Lack of action-Pilot - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2016_WPR16LA135.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, engine failure). All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…