NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR18LA092
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's inadequate preflight fuel planning and inadequate in-flight fuel monitoring which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion and an emergency landing and subsequent impact with a ditch.
Factual narrative
On February 19, 2018, about 1730 Chamorro standard time, a Cessna 172N airplane, N7328F, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident at the Francisco C. Ada/Saipan International Airport (PGSN), Obyan, Northern Mariana Islands. The pilot and passenger sustained minor injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 aerial observation flight. According to the operator, about 5 minutes after departure, the pilot reported that the engine began running roughly and then lost all power when the airplane was about 3 miles east of the airport and about 2,000 ft mean sea level. The pilot contacted a tower controller at the departure airport and reported that he intended to return to the airport, and the controller instructed him to enter the left downwind leg of the traffic pattern. While returning to the airport, the pilot was able to regain engine power by pumping the throttle control. While approaching the left downwind leg, the engine began to run roughly again, and the power decreased to 1,000 rpm. The pilot continued to pump the throttle control to no effect. Subsequently, the pilot declared an emergency, and a tower controller cleared him to land on an 8,700-ft-long, dry, asphalt runway. Due to the airport traffic in the area, the pilot chose to conduct a straight-in approach, instead of a 360° turn to lose altitude. According to a tower controller, the airplane was high and fast as it crossed the runway threshold and landed with about 1,000 ft of runway remaining. After landing, the airplane bounced several times, and the pilot subsequently deliberately veered it off the runway. Subsequently, the airplane impacted a ditch and nosed over. The pilot reported that he did not visually check the fuel in the tanks before departure. He subsequently reported that he did not recall whether he looked at the fuel quantity indicators before or during the flight. The pilot did not report if he conducted any preflight fuel planning. The operator reported that the fuel logs did not indicate that the airplane had been fueled on the day of the accident. The airplane’s previous flight times and fuel records were not obtained during the investigation. Examination of the airplane revealed that the wings, vertical stabilizer, and rudder had sustained substantial damage. No fuel was found in the tanks or the carburetor bowl during examination. A small amount of fuel was found in the gascolator bowl. No obvious stains or other evidence was found at the accident site indicating that fuel had leaked from the airplane. The gascolator was clear of debris. No fuel was found in the carburetor bowl. Examination of the engine and airframe revealed no evidence of any preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. According to the operator, about 5 minutes after departure for a local, aerial observation flight, the engine began running roughly and then lost all power. While returning to the airport, the pilot was able to regain engine power momentarily by pumping the throttle control, but shortly after, the engine began to run roughly again, and the power decreased to 1,000 rpm. Subsequently, the pilot declared an emergency, and a tower controller cleared him to land. Due to the opposite direction departing airport traffic, the pilot chose to conduct a straight-in approach instead of a 360° turn to lose altitude. After landing, the airplane bounced several times, and the pilot then deliberately veered it off the runway. Subsequently, the airplane impacted a ditch and nosed over. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the wings, vertical stabilizer, and rudder. The pilot reported that he did not visually check the fuel tanks before departure and that he did not recall whether he looked at the fuel quantity indicators before or during the flight. The pilot did not report if he conducted any preflight fuel planning. The operator reported that the fuel logs did not indicate that the airplane had been fueled on the day of the accident. During examination of the airplane, no fuel was found in the wing tanks or carburetor bowl. A small amount of fuel was found in the gascolator bowl. No stains or other evidence was found at the accident site indicating that fuel had leaked from the airplane. Examination of the engine and airframe revealed no evidence of any preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Although previous flight times and fuel records were not obtained during the investigation, given that the pilot did not check the fuel quantity before the flight, it is likely that his preflight fuel planning was inadequate because he did not ensure sufficient fuel was onboard for the flight and that he did not adequately monitor the fuel in flight, which led to fuel exhaustion and a subsequent total loss of engine power. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Planning/preparation-Fuel planning-Pilot
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Use of equip/system-Pilot
- — Aircraft-Fluids/misc hardware-Fluids-Fuel-Fluid level
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2018_WPR18LA092.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel exhaustion). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Crash Testing and Simulation of a Cessna 172 Aircraft: Pitch Down Impact Onto Soft Soil
During the summer of 2015, NASA Langley Research Center conducted three full-scale crash tests of Cessna 172 (C-172) aircraft at the NASA Langley Landing and Impact Research (LandIR) Facility.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM)
Simulating the Impact Response of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests of Cessna 172 Aircraft
During the summer of 2015, a series of three full-scale crash tests were performed at the Landing and Impact Research Facility located at NASA Langley Research Center of Cessna 172 aircraft.
- AOPA Air Safety Institute 2023 · Safety advisor
Safety Advisor: Fuel Awareness
AOPA Air Safety Institute safety advisor on preventing fuel-exhaustion and fuel-starvation accidents in general aviation. Covers pre-flight fuel planning, reserve requirements (14 CFR 91.151, 91.167),…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
Validation of Training Satisfaction Survey
The Training Satisfaction Survey (TSS) was developed as part of a larger project to examine the features of Virtual Reality software and supporting devices as a training program on visual illusions an…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Data in Brief)
Cockpit voice recorder transcript data: Capturing safety voice and safety listening during historic aviation accidents
Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) transcripts capture audio data within cockpit environments. This aids the investigation of causal factors contributing to aviation accidents by revealing communication and…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Safety Science)
Safety voice and safety listening during aviation accidents: Cockpit voice recordings reveal that speaking-up to power is not enough
Abstract Safety voice is theorised as an important factor for mitigating accidents, but behavioural research during actual hazards has been scant.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗